ALJDEC

99f-2621-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 1999-08-30

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

HEARING: August 19, 1999. APPEARANCES: Steven Lindquist, Complainant; Kathryn Lindquist, Complainant’s witness; Jeremy McGee, Complainant’s witness; and Robert Ryan, Respondent’s representative. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Dorinda M. Lang _____________________________________________________________________

The above matter came on for hearing on the 19th day of August, 1999 in Phoenix, Arizona. The purpose of the hearing was to consider Complainant’s complaint against Respondent for nonpayment of money.

FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Immediately prior to the formal opening of the scheduled hearing, the parties confirmed to the Administrative Law Judge that they had concluded a settlement agreement, the essential terms of which were read onto the record. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of the parties’ settlement agreement, Respondent agreed to pay or tender, and Complainant agreed to accept, a specified total monetary amount, no later than a stated deadline date, in full satisfaction of the complaint presently pending before the Registrar of Contractors. Complainant also agreed to withdraw its complaint and to consent to the entry of an Order dismissing the within Citation without prejudice to the reopening of same or the filing of a new complaint in the event of any breach by Respondent of the payment terms of the agreement. 3. The administrative disciplinary proceedings hereunder are effectively cut short by the entry into the above-described settlement agreement which is to be presented to the Registrar of Contractors for approval and adoption. Consequently, Respondent must be and hereby is advised that any future breach of the payment terms of the settlement agreement will not only constitute grounds for the filing of a new complaint but also shall warrant treatment as a circumstance in aggravation. 4. All rights and defenses of the respective parties are deemed to have been merged into the settlement agreement, and if any timely petition for rehearing of this matter is to be filed and granted, or if any new complaint is filed in the future, the sole issue for determination shall be whether Respondent has performed its obligations under the terms of the aforesaid settlement agreement. 5. The terms of the foregoing settlement agreement appeared to be fair and reasonable under all the circumstances, and the agreement was determined to be the product of knowing and voluntary action on the part of each party.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The policy of the law favors settlements of disputes, and adverse parties should be free to adjust their differences by entry into agreements or stipulations which should be recognized and given effect by all tribunals. 2. The settlement reached and submitted during the hearing of this matter, having been found to be reasonable and voluntarily made, warrants the termination of the instant hearing and the closing of the charges contained in the Citation and Complaint. RECOMMENDED ORDER In view of the foregoing, it is recommended that the entire Citation and Complaint in Case No. 99F-1057-ROC be dismissed. Done this day, August 30, 1999. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

______________________________________ Dorinda M. Lang Administrative Law Judge

Original transmitted by mail this ____ day of ____________, 1999, to:

Registrar of Contractors Mr. Michael P. Goldwater ATTN: Joyce Armijo 800 West Washington, 6th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85007

By ___________________________

-----------------------

Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826