ALJDEC - Licensing

2026A-00254-NPC-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2026-04-29

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

Sunbelt Rentals, Inc,

COMPLAINANT

v.

Burks Remodeling & Repairs LLC

License No. ROC 337680,

RESPONDENT

No. 2026A-00254-NPC-ROC

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

HEARING: April 14, 2026

APPEARANCES: Christyn Snow appeared on behalf of Complainant Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Adam D. Stone

EXHIBITS ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE:

_____________________________________________________________________

FINDINGS OF FACT

Burks Remodeling & Repairs LLC (Respondent) is the holder of License No. 337680 issued by the Registrar of Contractors (Registrar).

On or about January 8, 2026, Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. (Complainant) filed a Complaint against Respondent with the Registrar alleging that Respondent had failed to pay Complainant the sum of $2,169.56, for equipment Complainant rented to Respondent in connection with Respondent’s contracting business.

The parties were unable to resolve their differences, and Complainant requested an administrative hearing. The Registrar then issued a Citation for Alleged Violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10) on January 30, 2026.

On February 10, 2026, Respondent timely e-mailed a Response to the Citation.

The Registrar referred the matter to the Office of Administrative Hearings, an independent state agency, for an evidentiary hearing.

The Registrar issued a Notice of Hearing, setting a hearing at 9:00 a.m. on April 14, 2026. The Registrar mailed copies of the Notice of Hearing to Respondent at its address and email address of record.

By order dated March 2, 2026, the parties were advised the hearing would be held via Google Meet.

The hearing was held as scheduled on April 14, 2026. Christyn Snow appeared on behalf of Complainant, and testified that Complainant rented equipment and Respondent failed to pay three invoices, namely:

[number redacted]-0001 in the amount of $1,771.16.

[number redacted]-0001 in the amount of $150.18.

[number redacted]-0002 in the amount of $248.22.

The Tribunal waited for fifteen minutes, but Respondent failed to appear. Because Respondent did not appear through an authorized member, employee, or attorney, Respondent did not present any evidence to defend its license.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The burden of proof at an administrative hearing falls to the party asserting a claim, right, or entitlement and the standard of proof on all issues in these matters is by a preponderance of the evidence. See A.A.C. R2-19-119.

Respondent was deemed to have received the Notice of Hearing by methods reasonably calculated to effect notice. The Registrar mailed copies of the Notice of Hearing on Contested Case to its address and email address of record, and the Office of Administrative Hearings sent the order setting the Google Meet information to Respondent at its email address of record.

A preponderance of the evidence is “such proof as convinces the trier of fact that the contention is more probably true than not.” Morris K. Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence § 5 (1960).

A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10) includes among the grounds for suspension, revocation, or other disciplinary action against a contractor’s license,

[f]ailure by a licensee or agent or official of a licensee to pay monies in excess of $750 when due for materials or services rendered in connection with the licensee's operations as a contractor unless the licensee proves that the licensee lacks the capacity to pay and has not received sufficient monies as payment for the particular construction work project or operation for which the services or materials were rendered or purchased.

The evidence established that Respondent owed a total of $2,169.56 for equipment supplied.

Therefore, Complainant established that Respondent violated A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10) by failing to pay Complainant $2,169.56 for equipment rented in connection with Respondent’s contracting business.

Based upon Respondent’s violation of the provisions of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10), grounds exist to impose discipline against Respondent’s license.

RECOMMENDed order

Based on the foregoing, it is recommended that the Registrar suspend Burks Remodeling & Repairs LLC’s License No: 337680 issued by the Registrar until it has provided to the Registrar, and the Registrar has accepted, documents that establish that it has paid Complainant $2,169.56 in certified funds.

It is further recommended that when and if the Registrar receives and accepts Respondent’s evidence that it has paid Complainant $2,169.56 in certified funds, the Registrar may close the Complaint in Case No. 2026-00254.

Pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1092.08(I), the licensee may accept the Administrative Law Judge Decision by advising the Office of Administrative Hearings in writing not more than ten (10) days after receiving the decision. If the licensee accepts the Administrative Law Judge Decision, the decision shall be certified as the final decision by the Office of Administrative Hearings.

In the event of certification of the Administrative Law Judge Decision by the Director of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the effective date of the Order will be forty (40) days from the date of that certification.

Done this day, April 29, 2026.

/s/ Adam D. Stone

Administrative Law Judge

Transmitted by either mail, e-mail, or facsimile to:

Tom Cole, Director

Registrar of Contractors

Sunbelt Rentals, Inc

[email redacted]

[email redacted]

[email redacted]

Burks Remodeling & Repairs LLC

[email redacted]

By: OAH Staff