ALJDEC - Licensing
2025A-08375-NPC-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2026-04-29
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
Quality Sheet Metal Fabrication Inc.,
COMPLAINANT
v.
ALLTECH Solutions Inc.,
License No. ROC 296000,
RESPONDENT
No. 2025A-08375-NPC-ROC
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
HEARING: April 14, 2026
APPEARANCES: James Frontz appeared on behalf of Complainant Quality Sheet Metal Fabrication Inc.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Adam D. Stone
EXHIBITS ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE:
_____________________________________________________________________
FINDINGS OF FACT
ALLTECH Solutions Inc. (Respondent) is the holder of License No. 296000 issued by the Registrar of Contractors (Registrar).
On or about August 18, 2025, Quality Sheet Metal Fabrication Inc.(Complainant) filed a Complaint against Respondent with the Registrar alleging that Respondent had failed to pay Complainant the sum of $10,668.05, for material rendered to Respondent in connection with Respondent’s contracting business.
The parties were unable to resolve their differences, and Complainant requested an administrative hearing. The Registrar then issued a Citation for Alleged Violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10) on September 22, 2025.
On October 7, 2025, Respondent timely e-mailed a Response to the Citation.
The Registrar referred the matter to the Office of Administrative Hearings, an independent state agency, for an evidentiary hearing.
The Registrar issued a Notice of Hearing, setting a hearing at 3:00 p.m. on November 20, 2025. The Registrar mailed copies of the Notice of Hearing to Respondent at its address and email address of record.
A hearing was held on March 3, 2026, wherein Complainant failed to appear. However, a few hours later, Complainant filed a request to continue the matter due to an unexpected business call during the time of the hearing. The tribunal outreached the Respondent for its position and never received a response, thus an Order Granting Continuance was issued and emailed to the parties on March 9, 2026.
The hearing was held as scheduled on April 14, 2026. James Frontz appeared on behalf of Complainant, and testified that he performed all of the work, and Respondent failed to pay three invoices in full, and that the balance currently owed was $10,668.05 per the last statement sent on August 13, 2025.
The tribunal waited for fifteen minutes, but Respondent failed to appear. Because Respondent did not appear through an authorized member, employee, or attorney, Respondent did not present any evidence to defend its license.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The burden of proof at an administrative hearing falls to the party asserting a claim, right, or entitlement and the standard of proof on all issues in these matters is by a preponderance of the evidence. See A.A.C. R2-19-119.
Respondent was deemed to have received the Notice of Hearing by methods reasonably calculated to effect notice. The Registrar mailed copies of the Notice of Hearing on Contested Case to its address and email address of record, and the Office of Administrative Hearings sent the order setting the Google Meet information to Respondent at its email address of record, as well as the Order Granting Continuance.
A preponderance of the evidence is “such proof as convinces the trier of fact that the contention is more probably true than not.” Morris K. Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence § 5 (1960).
A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10) includes among the grounds for suspension, revocation, or other disciplinary action against a contractor’s license,
[f]ailure by a licensee or agent or official of a licensee to pay monies in excess of $750 when due for materials or services rendered in connection with the licensee's operations as a contractor unless the licensee proves that the licensee lacks the capacity to pay and has not received sufficient monies as payment for the particular construction work project or operation for which the services or materials were rendered or purchased.
The evidence established that Respondent owed a total of $10,668.05 for materials supplied.
Therefore, Complainant established that Respondent violated A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10) by failing to pay Complainant $10,668.05 for materials in connection with Respondent’s contracting business.
Based upon Respondent’s violation of the provisions of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10), grounds exist to impose discipline against Respondent’s license.
RECOMMENDed order
Based on the foregoing, it is recommended that the Registrar suspend ALLTECH Solutions Inc.’s License No: 296000 issued by the Registrar until it has provided to the Registrar, and the Registrar has accepted, documents that establish that it has paid Complainant $10,668.05 in certified funds.
It is further recommended that when and if the Registrar receives and accepts Respondent’s evidence that it has paid Complainant $10,668.05 in certified funds, the Registrar may close the Complaint in Case No. 2025-08375.
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1092.08(I), the licensee may accept the Administrative Law Judge Decision by advising the Office of Administrative Hearings in writing not more than ten (10) days after receiving the decision. If the licensee accepts the Administrative Law Judge Decision, the decision shall be certified as the final decision by the Office of Administrative Hearings.
In the event of certification of the Administrative Law Judge Decision by the Director of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the effective date of the Order will be forty (40) days from the date of that certification.
Done this day, April 29, 2026.
/s/ Adam D. Stone
Administrative Law Judge
Transmitted by either mail, e-mail, or facsimile to:
Tom Cole, Director
Registrar of Contractors
ALLTECH Solutions Inc.
[email redacted]
Quality Sheet Metal Fabrication Inc.
[email redacted]
By: OAH Staff