ORDER

2025A-01201-CHC-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2025-07-02

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

Mark Kinsman,

COMPLAINANT

v.

Premier Landscape Developments LLC

License No. ROC 344500,

RESPONDENT

No. 2025A-01201-CHC-ROC

ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

CORRECTING DECISION

In the June 9, 2025 Administrative Law Decision (Decision) in the above captioned matter, the Administrative Law Judge made two errors as to the stated party in Conclusions of Law #5 and #6.

In the Decision, Conclusions of Law #5 and #6 stated:

The evidence of record established that Respondent’s work was not in conformity with the Registrar’s standards in that Complainant failed to complete the work for which it contracted. Therefore, Complainant established that Respondent had abandoned the project in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(1).

The evidence of record established that Respondent’s work was not in conformity with the Registrar’s standards in that Complainant left incomplete work that it had begun to perform and/or failed to provide materials for which it contracted to supply and install. Therefore, Complainant established that Respondent failed to take appropriate corrective action to comply with this chapter or with rules adopted pursuant to this chapter without valid justification within a reasonable period of time after receiving a written directive from the Registrar in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(22).

This ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC is issued to correct Conclusions of Law #5 and #6 with the following deletions, indicated with strike-throughs, and additions, indicated with underlining:

The evidence of record established that Respondent’s work was not in conformity with the Registrar’s standards in that Complainant Respondent failed to complete the work for which it contracted. Therefore, Complainant established that Respondent had abandoned the project in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(1).

The evidence of record established that Respondent’s work was not in conformity with the Registrar’s standards in that Complainant Respondent left incomplete work that it had begun to perform and/or failed to provide materials for which it contracted to supply and install. Therefore, Complainant established that Respondent failed to take appropriate corrective action to comply with this chapter or with rules adopted pursuant to this chapter without valid justification within a reasonable period of time after receiving a written directive from the Registrar in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(22).

This ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC is retroactive to June 9, 2025.

Done this day, July 2, 2025.

/s/ Kay A. Abramsohn

Administrative Law Judge

Transmitted electronically to:

Tom Cole

Registrar of Contractors

[email redacted]

John Peru

[email redacted]

Premier Landscape Developments LLC

[email redacted]

Mark Kinsman

[email redacted]

By: OAH Staff