2023A-14258-CHC-ROC Notice of Hearing and Packet MAILED

2023A-14258-CHC-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2024-01-29

REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Dekel Saati , Case No. 2023-14258 COMPLAINANT, Docket No. 2023A-14258-CHC-ROC v. NOTICE OF HEARING ON CONTESTED CASE Jose Angel Negrete DBA: Green Tech Plumbing, License No. ROC 308399,

RESPONDENT.

This Notice of Hearing is issued under A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(D).

HEARING INFORMATION The hearing is set for:

March 14, 2024 1:00 PM Tammy Eigenheer Google Meet. A link will be provided directly from The Office of Administrative Hearings. Go to www.azoah.com to request to appear in-person.

If you have requested to appear in-person at the hearing, the hearing will

be held at 1740 W Adams Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007.

You must attend this hearing. This is an adversarial hearing before an administrative law judge, and is conducted in a similar manner as judicial proceedings. Thus, you must be prepared to present evidence, including witness testimony and documents, in support of your case.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION The State of Arizona has determined that the licensing and regulation of construction contractors is a proper state function, and has vested authority in the Registrar of Contractors

to administer Title 32, Chapter 10 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. A.R.S. §§ 32-1101 et seq.

All hearings for alleged violations of Title 32, Chapter 10 are conducted under Title 41,

Chapter 6, Article 10. A.R.S. § 32-1156.

The statutes and rules governing the hearing can be found at: Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 41-1092 to -1092.12, and Arizona Administrative Code R2-19-101 to -122. PARTICULAR ARIZONA STATUTES AND RULES INVOLVED The statutes and rules the Respondent is alleged to have violated are cited in the complaint and citation, which were served on the Respondent on January 4, 2024.

SHORT AND PLAIN STATEMENT OF THE MATTERS ASSERTED The complaint and citation allege that the Respondent committed the following act(s):

Charge: 1 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(1)

Charge: 2 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108(a)

Charge: 3 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(12) - A.R.S. § 32-1158

THE PARTIES TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING

Because Respondent is a licensee and is charged with an act(s) or omission(s) that is cause for the suspension or revocation of a license, Respondent is a party to this case and will be a party to the hearing. Because Complainant alleged Respondent committed an act(s) or omission(s) that is cause for the suspension or revocation of a license, Complainant is a party to this case and will be a party to the hearing.

Respondent and Complainant, as the parties to the hearing, will present evidence and

argument to the administrative law judge.

The Registrar’s assigned investigator will appear as a witness at the hearing.

RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED The parties to the administrative hearing may choose to be represented by an attorney. A.R.S. § 41-1092.07(B). If one of the parties is a company, the company may be represented by an officer or employee if that person satisfies the conditions set forth in A.R.S. § 32- 1156(B).

CHANGE OF ADDRESS Each party must inform the Registrar and the Office of Administrative Hearings of any change of address within five (5) days of the change. A.R.S. § 41-1092.04.

HEARING PROCEDURES AND RULES The administrative hearing will be conducted in accordance with A.R.S. §§ 41-1092 to -1092.12, and A.A.C. R2-19-101 to -122. The parties should review the statutes, rules, and processes governing the administrative hearing. Copies of the statutes, rules, and articles regarding the administrative hearing process can be found at https://www.azoah.com/.

REGISTRAR’S APPEARANCE BY VIDEO CONFERENCE OR TELEPHONE The Registrar’s investigators, employees, and attorneys will appear at the hearing via video conference or telephone unless requested by a party to appear in-person. Requests for the Registrar’s investigators, employees, or attorneys to appear in-person must be filed with the Registrar and the Office of Administrative Hearings no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the hearing date.

HEARING PACKET In the interests of administrative efficiency, the Registrar compiles and discloses

certain documents to the parties and the Office of Administrative Hearings. These documents

are attached to this Notice of Hearing as the “Hearing Packet.” If any party wishes to submit

additional evidence, they must do so during the hearing after completing a disclosure statement. See “Disclosure Statement” section below. SUBPOENAS FOR TESTIMONY FROM A WITNESS OR DOCUMENTS The parties to the hearing must be prepared to present evidence in support of their

case. If a party wants to obtain testimony from a witness or documents not in the party’s

possession, the party must prepare and file a written subpoena for the Administrative Law

Judge to review and sign, if approved. A.R.S. § 41-1092.07(C). Forms for requesting a

subpoena can be found on the Office of Administrative Hearings’ website at www.azoah.com. The party seeking a subpoena must serve notice on all the parties to the hearing, and on the Registrar. A.R.S. § 41-1092.04.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

At least seven calendar days before the hearing, each party must prepare and serve a disclosure statement on all other parties, and file it with the Office of Administrative Hearings. A.A.C. R4-9-118; A.A.C. R2-19-108. The disclosure statement must include any exhibit the party will use at the hearing. A party’s failure to timely disclose any witness or exhibit, without good cause, may result in the administrative law judge excluding those witnesses or exhibits from being used at the hearing. A.A.C. R4-9-118(C). A sample disclosure form is

available on the Registrar’s website at https://roc.az.gov/forms/RC-L-800A%20-

%20Prehearing%20Disclosure%20Statement%2020191007v4.pdf

CHANGING THE HEARING DATE The date of the hearing may only be advanced or delayed on the agreement of the parties or on a showing of good cause. A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(C). The date of the hearing may be changed by filing a written agreement of the parties to change the date of the hearing. The written agreement must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, directed to the assigned Administrative Law Judge, and transmitted to the Registrar and all other parties. The assigned Administrative Law Judge may be found on the Office of Administrative Hearings’ web portal at www.azoah.com If a party would like to move the date of the hearing without agreement of all parties,

the party must file a written motion with the Office of Administrative Hearings, directed to the

assigned Administrative Law Judge, and transmit a copy to the Registrar and all other parties.

The motion must state in detail good cause for why the date of the hearing should be advanced or delayed, and the position of all other parties regarding the advancement or delay. A party may also file a motion asserting a right to an expedited hearing upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances or the possibility of irreparable harm. A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(E).

RESOLUTION SHORT OF ADJUDICATION In any case which is resolved or settled by the parties, or which is withdrawn by the Complainant without objection from Respondent after the Notice of Hearing is issued, the parties must notify the Office of Administrative Hearings of the resolution or settlement. Any such cases will be listed on the Registrar’s website and its records under the category: “Closed Complaints – Resolved/Settled/Withdrawn.” Dated January 30, 2024.

By: /s/ Erika Hoskin Erika Hoskin Legal Secretary Legal Department Arizona Registrar of Contractors

Copy mailed via USPS First Class mail January 30, 2024 to: Respondent(s) Jose Angel Negrete DBA: Green Tech Plumbing, 2723. S Mary Ave Yuma, AZ 85365

Complainant(s) Dekel Saati 3106 S DROMEDARY DR Tempe, AZ 85282 Copy sent electronically this same date to: Respondent at email address on record with the Registrar Complainant at email address on record with the Registrar

Case No. 2023-14258 /

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

Hearing Packet FAQ What is the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet is a packet of certain documents collected or issued by the Registrar over the course of its investigation.

Who gets the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet is assembled and distributed to all parties and to the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) prior to an administrative hearing.

What types of cases does the Registrar prepare a Hearing Packet for?

The Registrar prepares a Hearing Packet for Complainant-Handled Cases and No-Pay Cases. Note: If the Docket Number on the Notice of Hearing contains a “CHC” or “NPC”, your case is a Complainant-Handled Case or a No-Pay Case.

What is in the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet contains essential case-specific documents and at a minimum will include the following documents:

● Original complaint;

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

● Citation; and ● Answer.

The Hearing Packet will also contain the following documents (if applicable):

● Jobsite inspection notices, notes, and photos; ● Written directives; and ● Compliance inspection notices, notes, and photos.

What if there are documents missing from the Hearing Packet?

If there is any evidence you submitted to the Registrar that are not included in the Hearing Packet it is your responsibility to introduce that evidence at the administrative hearing. Note: The administrative law judge assigned to your case does not have access to the entire Registrar record.

If there is additional evidence you submitted to the Registrar during the investigation that you also want to introduce as evidence during your hearing, it is your responsibility to:

● Properly disclose that evidence to the other party; and ● Introduce the evidence during your hearing.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

How do I disclose evidence I intend to use at a Hearing?

You must properly disclose any and all documents and witnesses you intend to use at your hearing according to the Registrar’s Prehearing Disclosure Rules. See Arizona Administrative Code Section R4-9-118.

A sample prehearing disclosure form and instructions are provided to the parties by the Registrar.

How do I obtain documents I previously submitted to the Registrar?

If you previously submitted documents to the Registrar and need a copy of these documents, please contact the Registrar’s Legal Department or submit a public records request at https://roc.force.com/AZRoc/s/roc-public-request.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Complainant: Dekel Saati 3106 S DROMEDARY DR Tempe, AZ 85282

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Respondent: Jose Angel Negrete DBA: Green Tech Plumbing 2723. S Mary Ave Yuma, AZ 85365

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 December 15, 2023

Jobsite Inspection Notice Re: Complaint Number 2023-14258

Dear Complainant and Respondent:

A formal complaint has been filed with the Arizona Registrar of Contractors.

A jobsite inspection is scheduled for December 18, 2023 at 1:00 PM. The Complainant is required to be present. The Respondent’s attendance is requested and encouraged. The Registrar encourages both parties to make a good faith effort to resolve this complaint prior to the jobsite inspection.

COMPLAINANT: 1. Under A.R.S. § 32-1155(D)(1), the Respondent must be allowed, upon request, the opportunity to inspect the work complained of within fifteen (15) days of receiving this notice. If Respondent is not provided an opportunity to inspect the work within the fifteen (15) day time period, the Registrar may be prohibited from taking further action on this complaint. 2. The Registrar may also be precluded from taking further action on this complaint, if the work that is the subject of the complaint is subject to neglect, modification, or abnormal use. A.R.S. § 32-1155(D)(2) 3. You must provide safe access to any area to be inspected. If access to a roof or other elevated area is required, you must provide a means to safely access the area (ladder or manlift as appropriate). Additionally, please secure any animals.

RESPONDENT: 1. Enclosed is a copy of the complaint. Under A.R.S. § 32-1155(D) you must be allowed, upon request, the opportunity to inspect the work complained of within fifteen days of the date of receipt of this notice. 2. To assist the assigned investigator in evaluating the merits of the complaint, please submit a response to the enclosed complaint to the assigned investigator prior to the scheduled inspection. 3. If you do not attend the jobsite inspection, your absence may negatively impact the investigation, and your interests. 4. If a building permit(s) was required for this project, please have the building permit information available at the jobsite inspection.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 If either party needs to reschedule the jobsite inspection, please notify the assigned investigator at least three business days prior to the inspection date to schedule a new date and time.

If the parties resolve the complaint prior to the inspection, please notify the assigned investigator in writing and by phone as soon as possible.

Sincerely, Mike Springer Mike Springer, Investigator #192 520 5089735 [email redacted] 1700 W Washington St,Suite 105 Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2812

CC: Choose an item. Choose an item. Choose an item. Choose an item.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 A Guide to Jobsite Inspections

Purpose of the Jobsite Inspection When the Registrar receives a complaint against a contractor’s license alleging poor workmanship, the Registrar generally schedules a Jobsite Inspection. The Jobsite Inspection serves two purposes: 1. To give the contractor an opportunity to inspect the complaint items; and 2. To give the Registrar an opportunity to determine if the contractor’s work violates Arizona law.

Jobsite Inspection Rights and Responsibilities Access to inspect: The property owner has complete control over who they allow on the property. However, if the Registrar’s investigator or the contractor cannot inspect the work, the Registrar will not move forward with a citation.

Cooperation: Arizona law enables injured parties to seek relief for damages through several paths. When dealing with a licensed contractor, the Registrar of Contractors’ administrative complaint process may serve as one of those possible paths. However, in order to use that path, the Registrar relies on the cooperation of all parties to a complaint.

Minimum workmanship: The Registrar investigates workmanship complaints for compliance with minimum workmanship and professional industry standards. The Registrar does not issue citations for work that meets these standards.

Scope: The scope of the Jobsite Inspection is limited to items listed in the complaint filed with the Registrar’s office. It is the complainant’s responsibility to point out the complaint item(s) and the Investigators role to review the item(s). If the complainant identifies additional workmanship items not listed in the original complaint, they must file an addendum to the complaint. The Registrar’s Investigator may identify additional administrative violations by the contractor (e.g. work performed out of scope of the license and failure to provide a contract that meets requirements set by Arizona law) at the time of the inspection.

The Role of the Investigator At the Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s investigator will: ● Only investigate the items listed on the complaint form filed with the Registrar. ● Will gather evidence to make an informed decision about the complaint items.

What to expect after a Jobsite Inspection After doing a Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s Investigator will leave the jobsite and review the evidence provided during the inspection. Generally, the investigator does not make any determination at the time of the jobsite inspection regarding whether the allegations listed in the complaint are supported. ● If the allegations are confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator may issue a Written Directive telling the contractor to correct the poor or incomplete work. ● If the allegations are not confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator will close the complaint.

Questions? If you have already filed a complaint and it was assigned to an investigator, you are encouraged to contact that investigator directly with the information listed in your jobsite inspection letter.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 If you have not filed a complaint yet or have not been assigned an investigator, you can reach the Registrar’s compliance department at (877) 692-9762.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 A Guide to Written Directives Purpose of the Jobsite Inspection When the Registrar receives a complaint against a contractor’s license, the Registrar generally schedules a Jobsite Inspection. The Jobsite Inspection serves two purposes: 1. To give the contractor an opportunity to inspect the complaint items; and 2. To give the Registrar an opportunity to determine if the contractor’s work violates Arizona law.

What to expect after a Jobsite Inspection After doing a Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s Investigator will determine whether the allegations listed in the complaint are supported. ● If the allegations are confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator may issue a Written Directive telling the contractor to correct the poor or incomplete work. ● If the allegations are not confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator will close the complaint.

Written Directives Access: In order to use the administrative process offered by the Registrar, a property owner must provide reasonable access to allow the contractor to fix their work as directed by the Registrar in a Written Directive. Complainants may not put any additional, unnecessary restrictions on the Respondent above and beyond the initial contract requirements agreed upon at the beginning of the project. Respondents are required to make repairs on items identified on any Written Directive, not otherwise restricted by local code or HOA limitations. Complainants must make access available to the Respondent to make the required repairs and failure to provide reasonable access may result in the Registrar dismissing the complaint.

Contractor obligations: The Written Directive will set a deadline for compliance. This is the period of time determined by the Investigator as necessary to complete the items listed in the Directive. ● The deadline for compliance assumes the contractor will promptly begin working on the items listed in the Directive. ● Do not wait. Both parties should communicate quickly to schedule the work.

Extensions: If good cause exists to extend this deadline, either party may submit a written request to the Investigator. The Registrar will review requests for extension and determine if the Directive should be extended.

Manner and method of performance: The Registrar does not provide specific instructions for how to correct poor work. A licensed contractor is expected to have the skill and professionalism to complete the work. Moreover, the complainant may not dictate the manner of repair. If the contractor fails to appropriately correct the work according to the contract, the Registrar will issue a citation.

Compliance Inspection: After the Written Directive expires, the Registrar’s Investigator will contact the complainant to determine if the contractor performed any corrective work. ● If the contractor did corrective work, the Investigator may schedule a Compliance Inspection to determine if the poor work is corrected. ● If the contractor did not perform any corrective work, the Registrar’s Investigator will not do a Compliance Inspection and will determine whether to issue a citation based on the administrative record.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Work performed after the directive ends: After the Directive period ends, a property owner may choose to allow the contractor to continue its work. The Registrar encourages parties to work cooperatively, but cannot require a homeowner to continue to allow a contractor access to the property after the Directive period ends in order for the administrative process to continue. Denying access after the Directive ends is not grounds to close or dismiss a complaint.

Questions? If you have already filed a complaint and it was assigned to an investigator, you are encouraged to contact that investigator directly with the information listed in your jobsite inspection letter. If you have not filed a complaint yet or have not been assigned an investigator, you can reach the Registrar’s compliance department at (877) 692-9762.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Jobsite Inspection Notes

Case No.: 2023-14258 Investigator: Mike Springer Inspection Date: December 18, 2023 Inspection Time: 1:00 PM

Complainant: Dekel Saati Respondent: Jose Angel Negrete Not Present: Not Present:

Jobsite General Notes: Photos were taken to document items. The complainant/Respondent and I addressed each item of the complaint. JSI audio recorded.

Complaint Item: 1 - Damages to sewer lines throughout the park, leaking sewage for over 14 days to people's yards.;14 busted waterlines, a few left not fixed and leaking; Trenches and roads are entirely backed up due to piles of dirt and digging left behind.;Stole materials and equipment from us; Electric lines left cut up; There are 5 pools of sewer crap leaking in different areas and tenants houses; Over 700 feet of trenches are left open through the park not the right slope ;The job was left undone, with lots of damage to the tenants and the park; The job was never completed. Only digging was partially done; when we met him last time Angel seemed completely stung by drugs; He was digging 14 days in the wrong direction only to realize the route was wrong wasted a large amount of money and caused damage; He ruin the gravel roads, leaving bumps and potholes in areas he never had to dig and covered; Broke fences and never fixed them Investigator’s Observation: The entire park has been excavated for new sewer lines. Tenant’s yards have been dug up, fences taken down. There are at least open sewer pits located directly adjacent to occupied homes. Entry roads have been excavated then refilled leaving low spots. Large rocks were reused in trenches

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov RCC100 08/19

with piping, no clean fill dirt was used. Respondent states he did not know the area would be so rocky, he is not used to this area. This was his general reason for not completing the project. I asked the Respondent if I issued a directive would he be able to finish the work, he stated he did not have funds for this. I informed him that this case would go directly to hearing due to his inability to complete the project and the public health hazard that exists. Governing Rule: Violation of any rule adopted by the Registrar; Namely A.A.C. R4-9-108(a): A contractor shall perform all work in a professional and workmanlike manner.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov RCC100 08/19

REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Dekel Saati, Case No. 2023-14258 COMPLAINANT, v. Jose Angel Negrete, CITATION DBA: Green Tech Plumbing, License No. ROC 308399,

RESPONDENT.

The Registrar issues this Citation to Jose Angel Negrete, (“Respondent”) under A.R.S. § 32-1155(A). If Respondent fails to answer this Citation by January 19, 2024, then under A.R.S. § 32-1155(C), Respondent’s failure to answer may be deemed an admission of the act or acts charged in the underlying complaint, and the Registrar may then suspend or revoke Respondent’s license(s). THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT On December 15, 2023, Dekel Saati, (“Complainant”) filed a written complaint with the Registrar. A copy of that Complaint is attached to this Citation. A FORMAL STATEMENT OF THE CHARGES AGAINST RESPONDENT The Registrar investigated this matter and finds cause to charge Respondent with violation(s) of Title 32, Chapter 10 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Respondent is charged with violating:

Charge :1 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(1) Abandonment of a contract or refusal to perform after submitting a bid on work without legal excuse for the abandonment or refusal.

of 5

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 Charge :2 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108(a) Violation of any rule adopted by the Registrar; Namely A.A.C. R4-9-108(a): A contractor shall perform all work in a professional and workmanlike manner. Charge :3 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(12) - A.R.S. § 32-1158 Failure in any material respect to comply with this chapter; Namely A.R.S. § 32- 1158.

If the matter proceeds to a hearing and the administrative law judge determines that any of the charges listed above are supported by a preponderance of the evidence, then Respondent’s license(s) may be subject to suspension or revocation, and Respondent may be subject to other penalties provided by law, including civil penalties under A.R.S. §§ 32-1154(E) and (F). FILING A WRITTEN ANSWER Respondent must appear by filing with the Registrar a written answer to the citation and complaint showing cause, if any, why Respondent’s license(s) should not be suspended or revoked. A.R.S. § 32-1155(A). Respondent’s written answer should contain the heading “Written Answer to Citation and Complaint” and should include the case number, which is Case No. 2023-14258. How to File a Written Answer: Respondent’s written answer may be submitted in the following ways: In-Person: 1700 W. Washington St., Ste. 105, Phoenix, Arizona, 85007-2812 Mail: P.O. Box 18244, Phoenix, Arizona, 85005-8244 Email: [email redacted] The Registrar’s normal office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If Respondent submits a written answer by mail, it is not filed with the Registrar until the Registrar actually receives it.

of 5

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 Deadline for Filing a Written Answer: Respondent must file a written answer with the Registrar no later than January 19, 2024. This deadline is calculated under A.R.S. §§ 32-1155(A) and (B), which provides a deadline ten days after service of the Citation. Service of the Citation and Complaint is complete five days after the Registrar mails a copy of the Citation and Complaint to Respondent’s latest address of record in the Registrar’s office. Consequences for Failing to File a Written Answer: If Respondent fails to answer, Respondent’s failure may be deemed an admission of the act or acts charged in the written complaint. A.R.S. § 32-1155(C). The Registrar may then suspend or revoke Respondent’s license(s). THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING If Respondent files a timely written answer contesting any charges in the Complaint, then the Registrar will request the Office of Administrative Hearings set a date for an administrative hearing and will notify all the parties at least 30 days before that hearing. A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(D).

INVESTIGATOR’S APPEARANCE AS A WITNESS The Registrar’s assigned investigator will appear as a witness at the hearing. If either party demands the attendance at the hearing of any other person, that party must obtain and serve a subpoena in compliance with the rules and processes established by the Office of Administrative Hearings. RESPONDENT’S RIGHT TO REQUEST AN INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Under A.R.S. § 41-1092.06, if Respondent submits a request to the Registrar for an informal settlement conference, the Registrar must hold a conference within 15 days after

of 5

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 receiving the request. Respondent’s request for an informal settlement conference must be in writing and must be filed no later than 20 days before the administrative hearing. A.R.S. § 41- 1092.06(A). The Registrar will not close or settle any case without both parties’ appearance at the Settlement Conference. The parties participating in the settlement conference must have the authority to settle the case and must waive their right to object to the participation of the Registrar’s settlement conference representative in the final administrative decision. A.R.S. § 41-1092.06(B). Any statements, either written or oral, made by the parties at the conference, including a written document, created or expressed solely for the purpose of settlement negotiations, are inadmissible in the administrative hearing. A.R.S. § 41-1092.06(B). RESPONDENT’S PRIOR RECORD Under A.A.C. R4-9-117, in determining the appropriate discipline, the administrative law judge and the Registrar may consider not only facts in the current case, but also facts in prior cases and any documents regarding Respondent on file with the Registrar. Respondent’s prior disciplinary record and current license(s) status may be considered as a mitigating or aggravating factor in determining the appropriate discipline. EVIDENTIARY DISCLAIMER By issuing this Citation, the Registrar is directing Respondent to file a written answer to the Citation and Complaint, showing cause, if any, why Respondent’s license(s) should not be suspended or revoked. A.R.S. § 32-1155(A). This Citation does not constitute proof that any charge or allegation in Complainant’s written complaint is in fact true. This Citation does not constitute proof that Respondent violated any statutory provision or rule adopted by the

of 5

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 Registrar. Dated January 4, 2024. By: /s/ Gail Mathews Gail Mathews Legal Assistant II Legal Department Arizona Registrar of Contractors

COPY of the foregoing mailed by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, January 4, 2024 to: Respondent Certified Mail No: [number redacted] Jose Angel Negrete DBA: Green Tech Plumbing 2723 S Mary Ave Yuma, AZ 85365-3003 Copy mailed by USPS First Class mail this same date to:

Respondent Jose Angel Negrete DBA: Green Tech Plumbing 2723 S Mary Ave Yuma, AZ 85365-3003 Complainant Dekel Saati 3106 S DROMEDARY DR Tempe, AZ 85282

Copy sent electronically this same date to:

Respondent at email address on record with the Registrar Complainant at email address on record with the Registrar

Case No. 2023-14258

of 5

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 Licensed Complaint Form Departmental Use Only For Current or Suspended Licensees

Person Filing Complaint Full Name (First Middle Last) Business Name (if a licensed contractor or supplier) ROC License Number(s) (if any)

Dekel Saati Mailing Address (Enter jobsite in Contract/Project section) City State Zip

3106 S DROMEDARY DR Tempe Arizona 85282 Phone Number Email

[number redacted] [email redacted] I consent to receive communications electronically in connection with this case Name of Attorney (if any)

Street Address of Attorney City State Zip

Phone Number of Attorney Email of Attorney

Contractor Information Name (as shown on contract/invoice) ROC License Number(s)

Jose Angel Negrete ROC 308399 Street Address City State Zip

PO BOX 2244 Sierra Vista Arizona 85636 Phone Number Email

(928) 285-3426 [email redacted] Name of Person(s) Representing License

Angel Negrete Contract/Project Information Contract Date Contract Amount Amount Paid

November 7, 2023 $32,794.53 $21,110.77 Date Work Started Date Work Stopped Date Work Was Completed

November 8, 2023 December 14, 2023 Close of Escrow (New Home) Move-In Date (New-Home)

Jobsite Street Address City State Zip

808 W Sieling Loop Bisbee AZ 85603 Name of Construction Site Owner Construction Site Name (if applicable)

Dekel Saati Parc Bisbee MHC Phone Number of Construction Site Owner Email of Construction Site Owner

[number redacted] [email redacted] This complaint is for Abandonment;Poor Work I have contacted the contractor by Phone/Text Have you filed a complaint in court? No

RCC099 12/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Licensed Complaint Form Departmental Use Only For Current or Suspended Licensees

Has any work been corrected? No

The contract was Written All change orders were Both This project was Commercial This project involved Other Replacing to new sewer lines A building permit was obtained by Contractor 20230682 bisbee List and briefly describe each complaint item (Please do not write "see attached" or use additional pages unless necessary to further describe issues or list more complaint items) (limited to 100 characters per line)

Damages to sewer lines throughout the park, leaking sewage for over 14 days to people's yards.;14 busted waterlines, a few left not fixed and leaking;Trenches and roads are entirely backed up due to piles of dirt and digging left behind.;Stole materials and equipment from us;Electric lines left cut up;There are 5 pools of sewer crap leaking in different areas and tenants houses;Over 700 feet of trenches are left open through the park not the right slope ;The job was left undone, with lots of damage to the tenants and the park;The job was never completed. Only digging was partially done;when we met him last time Angel seemed completely stung by drugs;He was digging 14 days in the wrong direction only to realize the route was wrong wasted a large amount of money and caused damage;He ruin the gravel roads, leaving bumps and potholes in areas he never had to dig and covered;Broke fences and never fixed them

Signature I declare under penalty of perjury that the information and documents contained on this Complaint Form, included with this complaint, or hereafter submitted in support of this complaint are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I will assist in the investigation or in the prosecution of the contractor or other parties, and will, if necessary, attend hearings and testify to facts. Printed Name Signature Date

Dekel Saati \complainant1\ \complainantd1\

RCC099 12/05/18 Page 2 of 2 INVOICE Bill To

Dekel Saati 798 W Ceiling Loop Bisbee, AZ 85603 (516) 244-9827

Green Tech Plumbing Payment terms Due upon receipt Invoice # 710 PO BOX 2244 Sirra Vista , Arizona 85636 Date 11/07/2023 Phone: (928) 285-3426 Business / Tax # CR-37 ROC#308399 Email: [email redacted]

Description Total

Sewer System Restoration $28,494.46 Install new 4" SDR35 system, and connect to exciting 4" city main sewer. 3" ABS pipe at unit connections.

*Connect Upper Row units: 860, 850, 840 to new sewer system. **Connect Upper Row units: 830, 820, 804, 808, 806, 798 thru exciting sewer line to new sewer system.

***Connect East Row units:780, 780B, 778, 788, 790, 794, 786, 784, 782, 780 to new sewer system.

****Connect Middle Row units:861, 851, 841, 833, 825, 821, 812, 811, 800 to new sewer system.

*****Connect Lower Row units:827, 819, 817, 815, 813, 415 to new sewer system

Two-way clean outs are to be installed at the end and the middle of each main sewer branches, at maximum 75 feet length.

Crush fine rock 6" bed under the pipe and 6"on top of the pipe to backfill with native ground.

Upper Row $1,367.73 **Connect 830, 820 individually to new sewer and 804, 808, 806, 798 to a new sewer lateral. 600ft SDR35

Middle Row $227.96 ****Sewer camera inspects the sewer line to 900 and replaces 80' of 4" pipe.

Upgrade main sewer pipe by city request $880.74 Upgrade 100' of 4" sewer pipe to 6" sewer pipe and fittings

Conduit pipe on road crossings $455.91

6" shut off valve by city request $1,367.73

Subtotal $32,794.53

Total $32,794.53

Payment Summary

11/07/2023 - Credit Card or PayPal $6,476.01 11/21/2023 - Credit Card $1,360.00 11/27/2023 - Credit Card $765.00 12/01/2023 - Credit Card or PayPal $1,010.00 12/06/2023 - Credit Card or PayPal $1,424.70 12/08/2023 - Credit Card or PayPal $1,020.00 12/11/2023 - Credit Card $5,226.82 12/11/2023 - Credit Card $2,982.39

Paid Total $20,264.92

Remaining Amount $12,529.61

Notes:

The project will start by installing and completing the main sewer system and then connecting the units to the new sewer system. 1-Excavate at connection point south east of unit 813 install main sewer line, south to north. Connect it to exciting 4" sewer pipe, get inspection and backfill. 2-Excavate main upper row sewer line, get inspection and backfill. 3-Excavate main east row sewer line, get inspection and backfill. 4-Excavate main middle row sewer line, get inspection and backfill. 5-Excavate main lower row sewer line, get inspection and backfill 6- Connect every individual unit using 3" ABS pipe

All water line brakes during excavation will be repaired immediately. Projected completion time two to three weeks

inspection log sheet

permit# 20230683 11/06/2023

This estimate is for completing the job described above it does not include material or labor cost for change order, permit fee, unforseen, or adverse circumstances should arise after work has started. Green Tech Plumbing contractor will warranty the job described above for five years from when the job is completed. Warranty includes pipe braking, sewer back up due to system malfunction.

1/16/24, 10:18 AM State of Arizona Mail - Case No. 2023-14258

Answers - AZROC <[email redacted]>

Case No. 2023-14258 message

Angel Negrete <[email redacted]> Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:44 PM To: [email redacted]

Jose Angel Negrete, Case No. 2023-14258 DBA: Green Tech Plumbing, License No. ROC 308399, 2723 S Mary Ave Yuma AZ 85365 Mailing Address: PO BOX 2244 Sierra Vista AZ 85366

Written Answer to Citation and Complaint January 15, 2024

Charge :1 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(1) Abandonment of a contract or refusal to perform after submitting a bid on work without a legal excuse for the abandonment or refusal.

I never abandoned the job that day I was in the job site for only an hour but had been working since 6:00 am picking up the excavator I got to the job site around 10:00 am Mr Saati was very hostile acting out distress and disoriented, we went for lunch around 11;00 am that day Mr. Saati kept calling and texting very hostile and very offensive saying “ get your ass over here right now” . We got back after eating lunch and Mr. Saati's erratic behavior continued. I told him I was leaving for the day and i will come back when he calm the fuck down and make the payment that I requested and needed to continue the job. When I was leaving he pulled a bucket out of my work truck containing some material for the job and some tools of mine I kept driving to avoid him acting like a spoiled brat. After that he kept sending messages threatening me that I'll be sorry and that he will call ROC.

When the inspector showed up I told them I don't want to leave the project due to the fact that I invest time and labor and I wanted to get paid but Mr. Saati didn't want to pay for the job that he owed me. Inspector called the project deemed and everything stays as it is. As I was leaving Mr Saati again started pulling tools out the back of my truck to the point that he called the sheriff and he ended up getting charges for theft.

This estimate #301 “Sewer System Restoration” $26,980 For completing the job described above; it does not include material or labor cost for change order, unforeseen, or adverse circumstances should arise after work has started. The estimate Mr Saati received clearly states “it does not include material or labor cost for change order, unforeseen or adverse circumstances should arise after the job has started.

https://mail.google.com/mail/b/AEoRXRTM9891YOCMY5kLMp3kOq1ZGB7uOEH25oWKa6yn33weXP2e/u/0/?ik=581c53cf5c&view=pt&search=all&p… 1/4 1/16/24, 10:18 AM State of Arizona Mail - Case No. 2023-14258

Sewer System Restoration doesn't mean Installing New Sewer System for which cost will be $18,000 just for materials Permit# 20230683 11/06/2023 cost $178.00 for a project under $10,000 A permit was pulled for Sewer System Restoration. Four sections will repair one section at a time. Mr. Saati kept telling and asking me to put skin on the project that he will not pay more than he had paid me till the job was completed. I told him I'm not a bank or investor, I'm a contractor. He pays and I do the work.

Mr. Saati kept asking for out of ordinary and not needed documents My Drivers Licence My Social Security card My TIN certificate before he made any payment when all is needed is W9 which I sent him and he keep saying wasn't valid and all kind of lies

It's clear to me that Mr Saati had all this planned. I have witnessed his own employees say Mr. Saati asked them to pay attention to the work so they finish it after he makes all this scam.

Mr. Saati asked every contractor in the area for an estimate and no one wanted to work with him his known for being shady and worst unfortunately for me, bean new in the area didn't know and found out too late.

He keeps pressuring me to invest money in this job when he knows I dont have the capital because I was open, clear and honest.

Mr. Saati is a stingy liar and a THIEF. The Sheriff Department has the report/citation#23-37355 for THEFT 12/18/2023 and I'm pressing charges for Defamation of Character for stating in a legal document that I was Drugged.

Payment Summary

11/07/2023 - Credit Card or PayPal $6,476.01 Deposit

11/27/2023 - Credit Card $ 765.00 Equipment needed

12/01/2023 - Credit Card or PayPal $1,010.00 Payroll

12/06/2023 - Credit Card or PayPal $1,424.70 Requested $4,200 to continue

12/08/2023 - Credit Card or PayPal $1,020.00 Payroll

Paid Total $10,695.71

Building Permit $178

Gravel $397.40

https://mail.google.com/mail/b/AEoRXRTM9891YOCMY5kLMp3kOq1ZGB7uOEH25oWKa6yn33weXP2e/u/0/?ik=581c53cf5c&view=pt&search=all&p… 2/4 1/16/24, 10:18 AM State of Arizona Mail - Case No. 2023-14258

Home Depot $334.10

Lowes $429.73

Ferguson $717.63

Benson Lumber $1475.36

ACE H $57.50

ACE H $207.97

Home Depot $435.73

Benson Lumber $356.20

Lowes $277.00

Labor 1 Frank $1,680

Labor 2 Daniel $1,260

Manager $5,760

Operation Expenses 11/06-12/18 $7,500

Total $21,066.62 - $10,695.71 = $10,370.91

Mr. Saati owes me $ 10,370.91

Charge :2 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108(a)

Violation of any rule adopted by the Registrar; Namely A.A.C. R4-9-108(a): A contractor shall perform all work in a professional and workmanlike manner. Are there any parties or people outside of the company who need to be involved in this business process? Their input might be key for you to decide aspects of the process. Those people should be referenced here.

The existing sewer system had back up and sewer overflow problems that in fact were unattended because of the conflict with property owner Mr Saati and non-payment.

https://mail.google.com/mail/b/AEoRXRTM9891YOCMY5kLMp3kOq1ZGB7uOEH25oWKa6yn33weXP2e/u/0/?ik=581c53cf5c&view=pt&search=all&p… 3/4 1/16/24, 10:18 AM State of Arizona Mail - Case No. 2023-14258

The broken water lines were expected due to the park being out of compliance with water lines 2” underground in a spiderweb distribution and added in the estimate that all water breaks will be repaired by contractor.

Mr. Saati laying again saying 14 lines were broken when were 6 lines broken

We can not be responsible for Electrical lines running bare cables not in conduit not marked all over the park.

Charge :3 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(12) - A.R.S. § 32-1158 Failure in any material respect to comply with this chapter; Namely A.R.S. § 32-1158.

Mr. Saati laying again and again we didn't steal material or anything he's the THIEF Sheriff Department has the report/citation#23-37355 for THEFT 12/18/2023

https://mail.google.com/mail/b/AEoRXRTM9891YOCMY5kLMp3kOq1ZGB7uOEH25oWKa6yn33weXP2e/u/0/?ik=581c53cf5c&view=pt&search=all&p… 4/4 Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 1 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 2 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 3 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 4 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 5 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 6 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 7 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 8 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 9 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 10 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 11 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 1 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 2 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 3 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 4 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 5 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 6 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 7 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 8 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 9 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 10 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 11 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 12 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 13 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Complaint # 2023- 14258 P 14 JSI address: 808 W Sieling Loop Date: 12-18-23 JSI PHOTOS Mediation Notice

Mediation Services Mediation services are available to the parties. What is Mediation? Mediation is a method of resolving disputes where the parties can end conflict without the expense and time associated with the full administrative process. Who Participates in During mediation, a mediator will attempt to help the Mediation? parties find an optimal solution to the conflict. Both parties must agree to participate in mediation, and both parties must bring a representative to mediation that has full authority to settle the entire matter. Mediation Is Not Neither the Registrar nor the Office of Administrative Mandatory Hearings will penalize a party for not agreeing to mediation. Where do the Parties The parties will meet at the Office of Administrative Meet for Mediation? Hearings to participate in mediation.

The Office of Administrative Hearings is located at 1400 West Washington, Suite 101, Phoenix, Arizona 85007. When does Mediation can occur after the Registrar issues a citation, but Mediation Occur? before the administrative hearing. Why Should Parties Mediation can be an alternative to the full administrative Consider Mediation? process. Mediation is beneficial because it is (1) time- efficient, (2) cost-effective, (3) confidential, and (4) capable of providing flexible solutions to complex problems. How to Request If the parties wish to mediate this case, they must file a Joint Mediation Request for Mediation with the Office of Administrative Hearings. A Joint Request for Mediation is included with this Mediation Notice. REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA _________________________ Case No. _______________ COMPLAINANT,

v. JOINT REQUEST FOR MEDIATION _________________________ RESPONDENT.

REQUEST

The parties jointly request that this matter be referred to mediation in the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). ☐ This matter is set for hearing on __________________(date). ☐ This matter is not currently set for hearing. MEDIATION AGREEMENT By requesting this mediation and signing below, the parties understand, represent, and agree: 1. The parties are prepared to commence mediation and will be ready for mediation on _____________________(date); 2. The parties will participate in the mediation process in good faith; 3. This request for mediation is not intended to hinder or delay administrative proceedings; 4. No party will contend that the mediation limits the power of OAH and its administrative law judges to conduct an administrative hearing and issue decisions under A.R.S. §§ 41-1092 – 1092.12; 5. The parties will be courteous and respectful throughout the mediation process to all participants; 6. The mediation is completely voluntary and the principal purpose is to allow the parties a full and fair opportunity to discuss settlement; of 3 REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS 1700 W. Washington St. Suite 105 – PHOENIX, AZ 85007-2812 Telephone (602)542-1525 1-877-692-9762 7. The mediator may conduct joint and separate meetings with the parties and may suggest resolutions to the parties’ dispute, but the mediator has no authority to impose a settlement upon the parties; 8. The mediation process is confidential. Communications made, material created for or used during, and acts occurring during mediation are confidential and may not be discovered or admitted into evidence in any proceeding except as provided by A.R.S. § 12-2238; 9. The mediator is not subject to service of process or a subpoena to produce evidence or to testify regarding any evidence or occurrence relating to the mediation except as provided in A.R.S. § 12-2238(C); 10. Neither the mediator, nor the Registrar of Contractors, nor the Office of Administrative Hearings is subject to civil liability for any act or omission in connection with any mediation service or activity except for acts involving

intentional misconduct or reckless disregard of a substantial risk of injury to the rights of others; 11. Throughout the mediation process, each party must have a representative present who will have full settlement authority to settle all claims at issue in the administrative

proceeding. 12. The mediation process will terminate when: a. The parties reach settlement; b. The mediator determines that further efforts at mediation are no longer likely

to achieve a settlement; or c. One of the parties withdraws from mediation. _____________________________________ _______________________ Complainant (or representative) Date

_____________________________________ _______________________ Respondent (or representative) Date

of 3 REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS 1700 W. Washington St. Suite 105 – PHOENIX, AZ 85007-2812 Telephone (602)542-1525 1-877-692-9762 PREHEARING DISCLOSURE STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS ***DO NOT SUBMIT THESE INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE PREHEARING DISCLOSURE FORM***

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES A copy of the Arizona Administrative Code’s Rules for the Registrar of Contractors can be located on the Registrar’s Website.

PREHEARING DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT Under A.A.C. R4-9-118(A), before a hearing, the parties must prepare a disclosure statement. The disclosure statement must contain: • A list of all the witnesses the party will call to testify, including the witnesses’ contact information and a brief description of the subject matter of the witnesses’ expected testimony; and • A list of all the exhibits that the party will use at the hearing.

FILE PREHEARING DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS • The Prehearing Disclosure Statements and Exhibits may be submitted to the Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings using any of the following: • Electronically: https://portal.azoah.com/submission/ • In-Person or by Mail: 1740 West Adams Street, Lower Level, Phoenix, Arizona 85007

EXCHANGING DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS Under A.A.C. R4-9-118(B) (effective November 5, 2017), a party to the hearing must serve on every other party and file with the Office of Administrative Hearings a copy of: • The disclosure statement; and, • Any exhibit that the party will use at the hearing. Service: The disclosure statement and exhibits must be served on all parties in accordance with Arizona Administrative Code R2-19-108 Filing Documents. Under A.A.C. R2-19-108, service is completed by: • Personal delivery; • 1st class, certified or express mail; or • Facsimile. Timing: The disclosure statement and the exhibits must be served and filed not less than seven calendar days before the date of the hearing. Under A.A.C. R2-19-108, a document is served on a party: • On the date it is personally served; • Five days after it is mailed by express or 1st class mail; • On the date of the return receipt if it is mailed by certified mail; or • On the date indicated on the facsimile transmission.

CONSEQUENCES FOR FAILING TO DISCLOSE Under A.A.C. R4-9-108(C), if a witness or an exhibit is not timely disclosed as required the rules, and good cause for the failure to disclose is not shown, then the administrative law judge may: • Order that certain witnesses or exhibits not be used at the hearing; • Order that a particular fact is or is not established for the record; or, • Order that a charge, a defense, a claim, or some portion thereof, be dismissed.

Form RC-L-800A Prehearing Disclosure Statement Rev. 10/08/2019 Instructions Form PREHEARING DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FORM RC-L-800A

PART 1: WITNESS LIST DOCKET NO. Under A.A.C. R4-9-118(A), before a hearing, a party must prepare a disclosure statement containing a list of all the witnesses the party will call to testify, including the witnesses’ contact information and a brief description of the subject matter of the witnesses’ expected testimony. If you need additional space to list all witnesses, complete and attach additional Witness Lists. Example 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

John Doe (123) 456-7890 [email redacted] 4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

John Doe will testify regarding the poor workmanship and poor installation of the Garage Door. Mr. Doe will also testify regarding the invoices and change orders for the project.

Witness 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

Witness 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

Witness 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

Witness 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

Form RC-L-800A Prehearing Disclosure Statement Rev. 1/15/2019 Page 1 of 3 PART 2: EXHIBIT LIST DOCKET NO. Under A.A.C. R4-9-118(A), before a hearing, a party must prepare a disclosure statement containing a list of all the exhibits that the party will use at the hearing. Note: All exhibits listed below must be provided to all parties to the hearing. See A.A.C. R4-9-118(B). If you need additional space to list all witnesses, complete and attach additional Exhibit Lists. Example Contract for new garage door. Invoice #10001 – Cost for garage door replacement.

Exhibit Exhibit Name

Form RC-L-800A Prehearing Disclosure Statement Rev. 1/15/2019 Page 2 of 3 PART 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT & SIGNATURE I certify that the above information is true and correct and that I will serve a copy of this disclosure statement and any exhibits listed in Part 2 to all parties to the hearing in accordance with A.A.C. R4-9-118. I acknowledge and understand that if I fail to properly disclose a witness or exhibit, the administrative law judge may: • Order that certain witnesses or exhibits not be used at the hearing; • Order that a particular fact is or is not established for the record; or, • Order that a charge, a defense, a claim, or some portion thereof, be dismissed.

I am the (check one):  Complainant  Respondent Docket No.

Print Name Signature Date

Form RC-L-800A Prehearing Disclosure Statement Rev. 1/15/2019 Page 3 of 3