2023A-12179-CHC-ROC Notice of Hearing & Packet MAILED

2023A-12179-CHC-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2024-05-30

REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Kristin Moore , Case No. 2023-12179

COMPLAINANT, Docket No. 2023A-12179-CHC-ROC

v. NOTICE OF HEARING ON CONTESTED CASE Sabino Roofing LLC License No. ROC 264104,

RESPONDENT. This Notice of Hearing is issued under A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(D).

HEARING INFORMATION The hearing is set for:

July 9, 2024 1:00 PM Tammy Eigenheer Google Meet. A link will be provided directly from The Office of Administrative Hearings. Go to www.azoah.com to request to appear in-person.

If you have requested to appear in-person at the hearing, the hearing will be held at 1740 W Adams Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007.

You must attend this hearing. This is an adversarial hearing before an administrative law judge, and is conducted in a similar manner as judicial proceedings. Thus, you must be

prepared to present evidence, including witness testimony and documents, in support of your case.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION

The State of Arizona has determined that the licensing and regulation of construction contractors is a proper state function, and has vested authority in the Registrar of Contractors to administer Title 32, Chapter 10 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. A.R.S. §§ 32-1101 et seq. All hearings for alleged violations of Title 32, Chapter 10 are conducted under Title 41,

Chapter 6, Article 10. A.R.S. § 32-1156.

The statutes and rules governing the hearing can be found at: Arizona Revised

Statutes §§ 41-1092 to -1092.12, and Arizona Administrative Code R2-19-101 to -122.

PARTICULAR ARIZONA STATUTES AND RULES INVOLVED

The statutes and rules the Respondent is alleged to have violated are cited in the

complaint and citation, which were served on the Respondent on April 24, 2024. SHORT AND PLAIN STATEMENT OF THE MATTERS ASSERTED

The complaint and citation allege that the Respondent committed the following act(s): Charge: 1 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108(a) Charge: 2 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(12) - A.R.S. § 32-1158

Charge: 3 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(22)

THE PARTIES TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING Because Respondent is a licensee and is charged with an act(s) or omission(s) that is cause for the suspension or revocation of a license, Respondent is a party to this case and will be a party to the hearing. Because Complainant alleged Respondent committed an act(s) or omission(s) that is cause for the suspension or revocation of a license, Complainant is a party to this case and will

be a party to the hearing.

Respondent and Complainant, as the parties to the hearing, will present evidence and

argument to the administrative law judge.

The Registrar’s assigned investigator will appear as a witness at the hearing. RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED The parties to the administrative hearing may choose to be represented by an attorney.

A.R.S. § 41-1092.07(B). If one of the parties is a company, the company may be represented

by an officer or employee if that person satisfies the conditions set forth in A.R.S. § 32-

1156(B).

CHANGE OF ADDRESS Each party must inform the Registrar and the Office of Administrative Hearings of any change of address within five (5) days of the change. A.R.S. § 41-1092.04.

HEARING PROCEDURES AND RULES The administrative hearing will be conducted in accordance with A.R.S. §§ 41-1092

to -1092.12, and A.A.C. R2-19-101 to -122. The parties should review the statutes, rules, and processes governing the administrative hearing. Copies of the statutes, rules, and articles regarding the administrative hearing process can be found at https://www.azoah.com/.

REGISTRAR’S APPEARANCE BY VIDEO CONFERENCE OR TELEPHONE

The Registrar’s investigators, employees, and attorneys will appear at the hearing via video conference or telephone unless requested by a party to appear in-person. Requests for the Registrar’s investigators, employees, or attorneys to appear in-person must be filed with the Registrar and the Office of Administrative Hearings no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the hearing date.

HEARING PACKET

In the interests of administrative efficiency, the Registrar compiles and discloses

certain documents to the parties and the Office of Administrative Hearings. These documents are attached to this Notice of Hearing as the “Hearing Packet.” If any party wishes to submit additional evidence, they must do so during the hearing after completing a disclosure statement. See “Disclosure Statement” section below.

SUBPOENAS FOR TESTIMONY FROM A WITNESS OR DOCUMENTS

The parties to the hearing must be prepared to present evidence in support of their

case. If a party wants to obtain testimony from a witness or documents not in the party’s

possession, the party must prepare and file a written subpoena for the Administrative Law Judge to review and sign, if approved. A.R.S. § 41-1092.07(C). Forms for requesting a

subpoena can be found on the Office of Administrative Hearings’ website at www.azoah.com. The party seeking a subpoena must serve notice on all the parties to the hearing, and on the Registrar. A.R.S. § 41-1092.04.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

At least seven calendar days before the hearing, each party must prepare and serve a disclosure statement on all other parties, and file it with the Office of Administrative Hearings. A.A.C. R4-9-118; A.A.C. R2-19-108. The disclosure statement must include any exhibit the party will use at the hearing. A party’s failure to timely disclose any witness or exhibit, without good cause, may result in the administrative law judge excluding those witnesses or exhibits from being used at the hearing. A.A.C. R4-9-118(C). A sample disclosure form is available on the Registrar’s website at https://roc.az.gov/forms/RC-L-800A%20- %20Prehearing%20Disclosure%20Statement%2020191007v4.pdf

CHANGING THE HEARING DATE

The date of the hearing may only be advanced or delayed on the agreement of the

parties or on a showing of good cause. A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(C). The date of the hearing may

be changed by filing a written agreement of the parties to change the date of the hearing. The written agreement must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, directed to the assigned Administrative Law Judge, and transmitted to the Registrar and all other parties. The assigned Administrative Law Judge may be found on the Office of Administrative Hearings’ web portal at www.azoah.com

If a party would like to move the date of the hearing without agreement of all parties, the party must file a written motion with the Office of Administrative Hearings, directed to the assigned Administrative Law Judge, and transmit a copy to the Registrar and all other parties. The motion must state in detail good cause for why the date of the hearing should be advanced or delayed, and the position of all other parties regarding the advancement or delay. A party may also file a motion asserting a right to an expedited hearing upon a showing of

extraordinary circumstances or the possibility of irreparable harm. A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(E).

RESOLUTION SHORT OF ADJUDICATION In any case which is resolved or settled by the parties, or which is withdrawn by the Complainant without objection from Respondent after the Notice of Hearing is issued, the parties must notify the Office of Administrative Hearings of the resolution or settlement. Any such cases will be listed on the Registrar’s website and its records under the category: “Closed

Complaints – Resolved/Settled/Withdrawn.”

Dated May 31, 2024.

By: /s/ Erika Hoskin Erika Hoskin Legal Secretary Legal Department Arizona Registrar of Contractors

Copy mailed via USPS First Class mail May 31, 2024 to:

Respondent(s) Sabino Roofing LLC 120 S. Houghton Rd. 138-269 Tucson, AZ 85748

Complainant(s) Kristin Moore 6138 E San Marino Tucson, AZ 85715 Copy sent electronically this same date to:

Respondent at email address on record with the Registrar Complainant at email address on record with the Registrar

Case No. 2023-12179 /

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

Hearing Packet FAQ What is the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet is a packet of certain documents collected or issued by the Registrar over the course of its investigation.

Who gets the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet is assembled and distributed to all parties and to the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) prior to an administrative hearing.

What types of cases does the Registrar prepare a Hearing Packet for?

The Registrar prepares a Hearing Packet for Complainant-Handled Cases and No-Pay Cases. Note: If the Docket Number on the Notice of Hearing contains a “CHC” or “NPC”, your case is a Complainant-Handled Case or a No-Pay Case.

What is in the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet contains essential case-specific documents and at a minimum will include the following documents:

● Original complaint;

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

● Citation; and ● Answer.

The Hearing Packet will also contain the following documents (if applicable):

● Jobsite inspection notices, notes, and photos; ● Written directives; and ● Compliance inspection notices, notes, and photos.

What if there are documents missing from the Hearing Packet?

If there is any evidence you submitted to the Registrar that are not included in the Hearing Packet it is your responsibility to introduce that evidence at the administrative hearing. Note: The administrative law judge assigned to your case does not have access to the entire Registrar record.

If there is additional evidence you submitted to the Registrar during the investigation that you also want to introduce as evidence during your hearing, it is your responsibility to:

● Properly disclose that evidence to the other party; and ● Introduce the evidence during your hearing.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

How do I disclose evidence I intend to use at a Hearing?

You must properly disclose any and all documents and witnesses you intend to use at your hearing according to the Registrar’s Prehearing Disclosure Rules. See Arizona Administrative Code Section R4-9-118.

A sample prehearing disclosure form and instructions are provided to the parties by the Registrar.

How do I obtain documents I previously submitted to the Registrar?

If you previously submitted documents to the Registrar and need a copy of these documents, please contact the Registrar’s Legal Department or submit a public records request at https://roc.force.com/AZRoc/s/roc-public-request.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Complainant: Kristin Moore 6138 E San Marino Tucson, AZ 85715

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Respondent: Sabino Roofing LLC 120 S. Houghton Rd. 138-269 Tucson, AZ 85748

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 November 1, 2023

Jobsite Inspection Notice Re: Complaint Number 2023-12179

Dear Complainant and Respondent:

A formal complaint has been filed with the Arizona Registrar of Contractors.

A jobsite inspection is scheduled for December 13, 2023 at 11:00 AM. The Complainant is required to be present. The Respondent’s attendance is requested and encouraged. The Registrar encourages both parties to make a good faith effort to resolve this complaint prior to the jobsite inspection.

COMPLAINANT: 1. Under A.R.S. § 32-1155(D)(1), the Respondent must be allowed, upon request, the opportunity to inspect the work complained of within fifteen (15) days of receiving this notice. If Respondent is not provided an opportunity to inspect the work within the fifteen (15) day time period, the Registrar may be prohibited from taking further action on this complaint. 2. The Registrar may also be precluded from taking further action on this complaint, if the work that is the subject of the complaint is subject to neglect, modification, or abnormal use. A.R.S. § 32-1155(D)(2) 3. You must provide safe access to any area to be inspected. If access to a roof or other elevated area is required, you must provide a means to safely access the area (ladder or manlift as appropriate). Additionally, please secure any animals.

RESPONDENT: 1. Enclosed is a copy of the complaint. Under A.R.S. § 32-1155(D) you must be allowed, upon request, the opportunity to inspect the work complained of within fifteen days of the date of receipt of this notice. 2. To assist the assigned investigator in evaluating the merits of the complaint, please submit a response to the enclosed complaint to the assigned investigator prior to the scheduled inspection. 3. If you do not attend the jobsite inspection, your absence may negatively impact the investigation, and your interests. 4. If a building permit(s) was required for this project, please have the building permit information available at the jobsite inspection. 1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 If either party needs to reschedule the jobsite inspection, please notify the assigned investigator at least three business days prior to the inspection date to schedule a new date and time.

If the parties resolve the complaint prior to the inspection, please notify the assigned investigator in writing and by phone as soon as possible.

Sincerely, John Smith, Investigator #194 (520) 483-0027 [email redacted] 1700 W Washington St,Suite 105 Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2812

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 A Guide to Jobsite Inspections

Purpose of the Jobsite Inspection When the Registrar receives a complaint against a contractor’s license alleging poor workmanship, the Registrar generally schedules a Jobsite Inspection. The Jobsite Inspection serves two purposes: 1. To give the contractor an opportunity to inspect the complaint items; and 2. To give the Registrar an opportunity to determine if the contractor’s work violates Arizona law.

Jobsite Inspection Rights and Responsibilities Access to inspect: The property owner has complete control over who they allow on the property. However, if the Registrar’s investigator or the contractor cannot inspect the work, the Registrar will not move forward with a citation.

Cooperation: Arizona law enables injured parties to seek relief for damages through several paths. When dealing with a licensed contractor, the Registrar of Contractors’ administrative complaint process may serve as one of those possible paths. However, in order to use that path, the Registrar relies on the cooperation of all parties to a complaint.

Minimum workmanship: The Registrar investigates workmanship complaints for compliance with minimum workmanship and professional industry standards. The Registrar does not issue citations for work that meets these standards.

Scope: The scope of the Jobsite Inspection is limited to items listed in the complaint filed with the Registrar’s office. It is the complainant’s responsibility to point out the complaint item(s) and the Investigators role to review the item(s). If the complainant identifies additional workmanship items not listed in the original complaint, they must file an addendum to the complaint. The Registrar’s Investigator may identify additional administrative violations by the contractor (e.g. work performed out of scope of the license and failure to provide a contract that meets requirements set by Arizona law) at the time of the inspection.

The Role of the Investigator At the Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s investigator will: ● Only investigate the items listed on the complaint form filed with the Registrar. ● Will gather evidence to make an informed decision about the complaint items.

What to expect after a Jobsite Inspection After doing a Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s Investigator will leave the jobsite and review the evidence provided during the inspection. Generally, the investigator does not make any determination at the time of the jobsite inspection regarding whether the allegations listed in the complaint are supported. ● If the allegations are confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator may issue a Written Directive telling the contractor to correct the poor or incomplete work. ● If the allegations are not confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator will close the complaint.

Questions? If you have already filed a complaint and it was assigned to an investigator, you are encouraged to contact that investigator directly with the information listed in your jobsite inspection letter. 1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 If you have not filed a complaint yet or have not been assigned an investigator, you can reach the Registrar’s compliance department at (877) 692-9762.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 A Guide to Written Directives Purpose of the Jobsite Inspection When the Registrar receives a complaint against a contractor’s license, the Registrar generally schedules a Jobsite Inspection. The Jobsite Inspection serves two purposes: 1. To give the contractor an opportunity to inspect the complaint items; and 2. To give the Registrar an opportunity to determine if the contractor’s work violates Arizona law.

What to expect after a Jobsite Inspection After doing a Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s Investigator will determine whether the allegations listed in the complaint are supported. ● If the allegations are confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator may issue a Written Directive telling the contractor to correct the poor or incomplete work. ● If the allegations are not confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator will close the complaint.

Written Directives Access: In order to use the administrative process offered by the Registrar, a property owner must provide reasonable access to allow the contractor to fix their work as directed by the Registrar in a Written Directive. Complainants may not put any additional, unnecessary restrictions on the Respondent above and beyond the initial contract requirements agreed upon at the beginning of the project. Respondents are required to make repairs on items identified on any Written Directive, not otherwise restricted by local code or HOA limitations. Complainants must make access available to the Respondent to make the required repairs and failure to provide reasonable access may result in the Registrar dismissing the complaint.

Contractor obligations: The Written Directive will set a deadline for compliance. This is the period of time determined by the Investigator as necessary to complete the items listed in the Directive. ● The deadline for compliance assumes the contractor will promptly begin working on the items listed in the Directive. ● Do not wait. Both parties should communicate quickly to schedule the work.

Extensions: If good cause exists to extend this deadline, either party may submit a written request to the Investigator. The Registrar will review requests for extension and determine if the Directive should be extended.

Manner and method of performance: The Registrar does not provide specific instructions for how to correct poor work. A licensed contractor is expected to have the skill and professionalism to complete the work. Moreover, the complainant may not dictate the manner of repair. If the contractor fails to appropriately correct the work according to the contract, the Registrar will issue a citation.

Compliance Inspection: After the Written Directive expires, the Registrar’s Investigator will contact the complainant to determine if the contractor performed any corrective work. ● If the contractor did corrective work, the Investigator may schedule a Compliance Inspection to determine if the poor work is corrected. ● If the contractor did not perform any corrective work, the Registrar’s Investigator will not do a Compliance Inspection and will determine whether to issue a citation based on the administrative record.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Work performed after the directive ends: After the Directive period ends, a property owner may choose to allow the contractor to continue its work. The Registrar encourages parties to work cooperatively, but cannot require a homeowner to continue to allow a contractor access to the property after the Directive period ends in order for the administrative process to continue. Denying access after the Directive ends is not grounds to close or dismiss a complaint.

Questions? If you have already filed a complaint and it was assigned to an investigator, you are encouraged to contact that investigator directly with the information listed in your jobsite inspection letter. If you have not filed a complaint yet or have not been assigned an investigator, you can reach the Registrar’s compliance department at (877) 692-9762.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Arizona Registrar of Contractors Jobsite Inspection Notes Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Complainant: Kristin Moore Respondent: Sabino Roofing LLC

Present for the complainant: Kristin Moore Present for the respondent: Jesus Yzabal Overview of project: New metal roof

Complaint Item 1: “Roof is incomplete for main house and guest house. Underlayment rotting where metal was never placed. Underlayment calls for double layer and only a single layer was installed. Missing sidewall flashing Missing Hip trim Missing metal field panels on main house and guest house Inconsistent metal flashings installed. Some are color matched to field panels, some are not. There are no neoprene roof jacks installed at terminations. Panels ard consistent of a curved bell with a flat area. Approximately 25 % of panels are dented or depressed areas on the bell portion of the metal panels. Several of the field panels are not “locked” or hooked into the previous panels for correct overlap. Some panels were cut incorrectly at the roof to wall area. Gaps in installation leaving roof exposed in areas that appear to be finished. Seams not flush. Bird Screen needs to be installed. Overall the areas that appear finished n do not match manufacturers finished product pictures.” Investigator’s Observations: Verified. Conditions observed during the ROC jobsite inspection: • The roofing project is not complete. • Work has not been completed per contract. • Several areas of missing and/or incomplete roof edge • Several areas of exposed deteriorated underlayment, throughout the entire roof. Exposed underlayment is a result of: o Incomplete work o Gaps and voids in the roofing material o Improper flashings • Numerous and excessive dents, wrinkles, and damaged roofing material • Flashings not behind stucco • Roofing material not parallel with house walls • Several areas of roof panels not interlocked, and exposed cut edges • Gaps where roofing components are not properly overlapped and/or not properly interlocked • Uneven, exposed, poor cuts • Improper, poor, and inconsistent flashings at penetrations • Exposed fasteners • Valley(s) terminate/discharge below roofing material • Missing ridge/hip cap material • Uneven cuts at valleys / inconsistent materials at valleys RCC100

Arizona Registrar of Contractors Jobsite Inspection Notes A roof evaluation report from Headlee Roofing Co. Inc. ROC 075771, includes the flowing: • After looking at the roofing at the above listed address, these are my findings: 1. The roofing job is incomplete. There are missing sidewall flashing. 2. There are missing hip trim. 3. There are missing field panels on the guest house west deck and at the main house fireplace. 4. There are inconsistent metal flashings installed. Some are color matched to the field panels, others are left galvanized. 5. There are no neoprene roof jacks installed at terminations. 6. The panels consistent of a curved bell with a flat area. Approximately 25% of the panels have dented or depressed areas on the bell portion of the metal panels. 7. Several of the field panels are not “locked” or hooked into the previous panels for correct overlap. 8. At south deck offset at 2nd story, panels were cut incorrectly at the roof to wall area. • These metal panels are installed starting at the bottom right side of a deck. They continue from right to left to finish off a deck slope. The next row is “clipped” over the previous row, screwed down at the top, and the installation continues. Specific metal panels can’t be removed from the middle of a deck. • It is the opinion of this roofing contractor that the existing metal panels be removed, a new underlayment installed for dry in due to the removal of all the screw attachments, and a new metal roofing panel be installed complete with all neoprene roof jacks, color coordinated trim and flashing pieces. In response to this roof evaluation report, the respondent sent an email that includes: • “I don’t disagree with what needs to be done since fixing this after all this time has passed will never be as it was supposed to be.” Governing Rule: A.R.S. § 32-1154 (A)(3) - R4-9-108(a): Violation of any rule adopted by the registrar; Namely R 4-9-108(a) A contractor shall perform work in a professional and workmanlike manner. REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION: The respondent is correct all deficiencies by appropriate means, which includes “…the existing metal panels be removed, a new underlayment installed for dry in due to the removal of all the screw attachments, and a new metal roofing panel be installed complete with all neoprene roof jacks, color coordinated trim and flashing pieces.”

ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS In addition to the allegations in the complaint, the following violations were verified:

RCC100 11/14

Arizona Registrar of Contractors Jobsite Inspection Notes 1: The name of the contractor and the contractor's business address and license number. 2: The name and mailing address of the owner and the jobsite address or legal description. 3: The date the parties entered into the contract. 4: The estimated date of completion of all work to be performed under the contract. 5: A description of the work to be performed under the contract. 6: The total dollar amount to be paid to the contractor by the owner for all work to be performed under the contract, including all applicable taxes. 7: The dollar amount of any advance deposit paid or scheduled to be paid to the contractor by the owner. 8: The dollar amount of any progress payment and the stage of construction at which the contractor will be entitled to collect progress payments during the course of construction under the contract. 9a: That the property owner has the right to file a written complaint with the registrar for an alleged violation of section 32-1154, subsection A. 9b: The contract shall contain the registrar's telephone number and website address and shall state that complaints must be made within the applicable time period as set forth in section 32-1155, subsection A. 9c: The information in this paragraph must be prominently displayed in the contract in at least ten point bold type... 9d: ...and the contract shall be signed by the property owner and the contractor or the contractor's designated representative. REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION: The respondent is to submit a copy of a current contract form that complies with A.R.S. § 32-1158

RCC100 11/14

Jobsite Inspection Photos 1 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Several areas of missing and/or incomplete roof edge

Jobsite Inspection Photos 2 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Several areas of missing and/or incomplete roof edge

Jobsite Inspection Photos 3 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Several areas of missing and/or incomplete roof edge

Jobsite Inspection Photos 4 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Several areas of missing and/or incomplete roof edge

Jobsite Inspection Photos 5 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Several areas of exposed deteriorated underlayment, throughout the entire roof. Exposed underlayment is a result of: o Incomplete work o Gaps and voids in the roofing material o Improper flashings

Jobsite Inspection Photos 6 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 7 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 8 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 9 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 10 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 11 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 12 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 13 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 14 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

Jobsite Inspection Photos 15 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Numerous and excessive dents, wrinkles, and damaged roofing material

Jobsite Inspection Photos 16 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Numerous and excessive dents, wrinkles, and damaged roofing material

Jobsite Inspection Photos 17 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Numerous and excessive dents, wrinkles, and damaged roofing material

Jobsite Inspection Photos 18 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Numerous and excessive dents, wrinkles, and damaged roofing material

Jobsite Inspection Photos 19 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Numerous and excessive dents, wrinkles, and damaged roofing material

Jobsite Inspection Photos 20 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Numerous and excessive dents, wrinkles, and damaged roofing material

Jobsite Inspection Photos 21 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 22 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 23 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 24 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 25 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 26 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 27 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 28 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 29 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 30 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Flashings not behind stucco

Jobsite Inspection Photos 31 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Roofing material not parallel with house walls

Jobsite Inspection Photos 32 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715

• Roofing material not parallel with house walls

Jobsite Inspection Photos 33 Complaint No.: 2023-12179 Investigator: John Smith #194 Inspection Date: 12/13/2023 Inspection Time: 11:00AM Jobsite address: 6138 E. San Marino, Tucson, AZ 85715