2023A-10443-CHC-ROC Notice of Hearing and Packet MAILED

2023A-10443-CHC-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2024-01-08

REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Guillermo Amarillas , Case No. 2023-10443 COMPLAINANT, Docket No. 2023A-10443-CHC-ROC

v. NOTICE OF HEARING ON CONTESTED CASE Esplendor's Home Building LLC License No. ROC 219516,

RESPONDENT.

This Notice of Hearing is issued under A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(D). HEARING INFORMATION The hearing is set for: February 23, 2024 1:00 PM Amy Haley Google Meet. A link will be provided directly from The Office of Administrative Hearings. Go to www.azoah.com to request to appear in-person.

If you have requested to appear in-person at the hearing, the hearing will be held at 1740 W Adams Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007.

You must attend this hearing. This is an adversarial hearing before an administrative law judge, and is conducted in a similar manner as judicial proceedings. Thus, you must be prepared to present evidence, including witness testimony and documents, in support of your case.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION The State of Arizona has determined that the licensing and regulation of construction contractors is a proper state function, and has vested authority in the Registrar of Contractors

to administer Title 32, Chapter 10 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. A.R.S. §§ 32-1101 et seq.

All hearings for alleged violations of Title 32, Chapter 10 are conducted under Title 41,

Chapter 6, Article 10. A.R.S. § 32-1156.

The statutes and rules governing the hearing can be found at: Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 41-1092 to -1092.12, and Arizona Administrative Code R2-19-101 to -122. PARTICULAR ARIZONA STATUTES AND RULES INVOLVED The statutes and rules the Respondent is alleged to have violated are cited in the complaint and citation, which were served on the Respondent on December 19, 2023.

SHORT AND PLAIN STATEMENT OF THE MATTERS ASSERTED The complaint and citation allege that the Respondent committed the following act(s):

Charge: 1 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108(a)

Charge: 2 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108(b)

Charge: 3 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(12) - A.R.S. § 32-1158

Charge: 4 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(22)

THE PARTIES TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING Because Respondent is a licensee and is charged with an act(s) or omission(s) that is

cause for the suspension or revocation of a license, Respondent is a party to this case and will

be a party to the hearing.

Because Complainant alleged Respondent committed an act(s) or omission(s) that is cause for the suspension or revocation of a license, Complainant is a party to this case and will be a party to the hearing. Respondent and Complainant, as the parties to the hearing, will present evidence and argument to the administrative law judge. The Registrar’s assigned investigator will appear as a witness at the hearing.

RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED The parties to the administrative hearing may choose to be represented by an attorney. A.R.S. § 41-1092.07(B). If one of the parties is a company, the company may be represented

by an officer or employee if that person satisfies the conditions set forth in A.R.S. § 32-

1156(B).

CHANGE OF ADDRESS Each party must inform the Registrar and the Office of Administrative Hearings of

any change of address within five (5) days of the change. A.R.S. § 41-1092.04.

HEARING PROCEDURES AND RULES The administrative hearing will be conducted in accordance with A.R.S. §§ 41-1092

to -1092.12, and A.A.C. R2-19-101 to -122. The parties should review the statutes, rules, and processes governing the administrative hearing. Copies of the statutes, rules, and articles

regarding the administrative hearing process can be found at https://www.azoah.com/.

REGISTRAR’S APPEARANCE BY VIDEO CONFERENCE OR TELEPHONE

The Registrar’s investigators, employees, and attorneys will appear at the hearing via

video conference or telephone unless requested by a party to appear in-person. Requests for

the Registrar’s investigators, employees, or attorneys to appear in-person must be filed with the Registrar and the Office of Administrative Hearings no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the hearing date.

HEARING PACKET In the interests of administrative efficiency, the Registrar compiles and discloses certain documents to the parties and the Office of Administrative Hearings. These documents are attached to this Notice of Hearing as the “Hearing Packet.” If any party wishes to submit additional evidence, they must do so during the hearing after completing a disclosure statement. See “Disclosure Statement” section below.

SUBPOENAS FOR TESTIMONY FROM A WITNESS OR DOCUMENTS The parties to the hearing must be prepared to present evidence in support of their case. If a party wants to obtain testimony from a witness or documents not in the party’s possession, the party must prepare and file a written subpoena for the Administrative Law Judge to review and sign, if approved. A.R.S. § 41-1092.07(C). Forms for requesting a subpoena can be found on the Office of Administrative Hearings’ website at www.azoah.com. The party seeking a subpoena must serve notice on all the parties to the hearing, and on the Registrar. A.R.S. § 41-1092.04.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT At least seven calendar days before the hearing, each party must prepare and serve a

disclosure statement on all other parties, and file it with the Office of Administrative Hearings.

A.A.C. R4-9-118; A.A.C. R2-19-108. The disclosure statement must include any exhibit the

party will use at the hearing. A party’s failure to timely disclose any witness or exhibit, without good cause, may result in the administrative law judge excluding those witnesses or exhibits from being used at the hearing. A.A.C. R4-9-118(C). A sample disclosure form is available on the Registrar’s website at https://roc.az.gov/forms/RC-L-800A%20- %20Prehearing%20Disclosure%20Statement%2020191007v4.pdf

CHANGING THE HEARING DATE The date of the hearing may only be advanced or delayed on the agreement of the

parties or on a showing of good cause. A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(C). The date of the hearing may

be changed by filing a written agreement of the parties to change the date of the hearing. The

written agreement must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, directed to the

assigned Administrative Law Judge, and transmitted to the Registrar and all other parties. The

assigned Administrative Law Judge may be found on the Office of Administrative Hearings’ web portal at www.azoah.com If a party would like to move the date of the hearing without agreement of all parties, the party must file a written motion with the Office of Administrative Hearings, directed to the assigned Administrative Law Judge, and transmit a copy to the Registrar and all other parties.

The motion must state in detail good cause for why the date of the hearing should be advanced or delayed, and the position of all other parties regarding the advancement or delay. A party may also file a motion asserting a right to an expedited hearing upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances or the possibility of irreparable harm. A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(E).

RESOLUTION SHORT OF ADJUDICATION In any case which is resolved or settled by the parties, or which is withdrawn by the Complainant without objection from Respondent after the Notice of Hearing is issued, the parties must notify the Office of Administrative Hearings of the resolution or settlement. Any such cases will be listed on the Registrar’s website and its records under the category: “Closed Complaints – Resolved/Settled/Withdrawn.” Dated January 9, 2024.

By: /s/ Erika Hoskin Erika Hoskin Legal Secretary Legal Department Arizona Registrar of Contractors

Copy mailed via USPS First Class mail January 9, 2024 to: Respondent(s) Esplendor's Home Building LLC 407 Rio Rico Dr. Rio Rico, AZ 85648

Complainant(s) Guillermo Amarillas 299 Camino Panama Rio Rico, AZ 85648

Copy sent electronically this same date to: Respondent at email address on record with the Registrar Complainant at email address on record with the Registrar

Case No. 2023-10443 /

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

Hearing Packet FAQ What is the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet is a packet of certain documents collected or issued by the Registrar over the course of its investigation.

Who gets the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet is assembled and distributed to all parties and to the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) prior to an administrative hearing.

What types of cases does the Registrar prepare a Hearing Packet for?

The Registrar prepares a Hearing Packet for Complainant-Handled Cases and No-Pay Cases. Note: If the Docket Number on the Notice of Hearing contains a “CHC” or “NPC”, your case is a Complainant-Handled Case or a No-Pay Case.

What is in the Hearing Packet?

The Hearing Packet contains essential case-specific documents and at a minimum will include the following documents:

● Original complaint;

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

● Citation; and ● Answer.

The Hearing Packet will also contain the following documents (if applicable):

● Jobsite inspection notices, notes, and photos; ● Written directives; and ● Compliance inspection notices, notes, and photos.

What if there are documents missing from the Hearing Packet?

If there is any evidence you submitted to the Registrar that are not included in the Hearing Packet it is your responsibility to introduce that evidence at the administrative hearing. Note: The administrative law judge assigned to your case does not have access to the entire Registrar record.

If there is additional evidence you submitted to the Registrar during the investigation that you also want to introduce as evidence during your hearing, it is your responsibility to:

● Properly disclose that evidence to the other party; and ● Introduce the evidence during your hearing.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Katie Hobbs, Governor Martin Quezada, Director

How do I disclose evidence I intend to use at a Hearing?

You must properly disclose any and all documents and witnesses you intend to use at your hearing according to the Registrar’s Prehearing Disclosure Rules. See Arizona Administrative Code Section R4-9-118.

A sample prehearing disclosure form and instructions are provided to the parties by the Registrar.

How do I obtain documents I previously submitted to the Registrar?

If you previously submitted documents to the Registrar and need a copy of these documents, please contact the Registrar’s Legal Department or submit a public records request at https://roc.force.com/AZRoc/s/roc-public-request.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812 602.542.1525 · Within AZ 877.692.9762 · Fax 602.542.1599 · roc.az.gov Hearing Packet FAQ

Complainant: Guillermo Amarillas 299 Camino Panama Rio Rico, AZ 85648

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Respondent: Esplendor's Home Building LLC 407 Rio Rico Dr. Rio Rico, AZ 85648

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 October 2, 2023

Jobsite Inspection Notice Re: Complaint Number 2023-10443

Dear Complainant and Respondent:

A formal complaint has been filed with the Arizona Registrar of Contractors.

A jobsite inspection is scheduled for October 12, 2023 at 9:30 AM. The Complainant is required to be present. The Respondent’s attendance is requested and encouraged. The Registrar encourages both parties to make a good faith effort to resolve this complaint prior to the jobsite inspection.

COMPLAINANT: 1. Under A.R.S. § 32-1155(D)(1), the Respondent must be allowed, upon request, the opportunity to inspect the work complained of within fifteen (15) days of receiving this notice. If Respondent is not provided an opportunity to inspect the work within the fifteen (15) day time period, the Registrar may be prohibited from taking further action on this complaint. 2. The Registrar may also be precluded from taking further action on this complaint, if the work that is the subject of the complaint is subject to neglect, modification, or abnormal use. A.R.S. § 32-1155(D)(2) 3. You must provide safe access to any area to be inspected. If access to a roof or other elevated area is required, you must provide a means to safely access the area (ladder or manlift as appropriate). Additionally, please secure any animals.

RESPONDENT: 1. Under A.R.S. § 32-1155(D) you must be allowed, upon request, the opportunity to inspect the work complained of within fifteen days of the date of receipt of this notice. 2. If you do not attend the jobsite inspection, your absence may negatively impact the investigation, and your interests. 3. If a building permit(s) was required for this project, please have the building permit information available at the jobsite inspection.

If either party needs to reschedule the jobsite inspection, please notify the assigned investigator at least three business days prior to the inspection date to schedule a new date and time.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 If the parties resolve the complaint prior to the inspection, please notify the assigned investigator in writing and by phone as soon as possible.

Sincerely, Gregory Johndrow Gregory Johndrow, Investigator #195 (520) 628-6896 [email redacted] 1700 W. Washington St., Ste. 105 Phoenix, Arizona 85007

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 A Guide to Jobsite Inspections

Purpose of the Jobsite Inspection When the Registrar receives a complaint against a contractor’s license alleging poor workmanship, the Registrar generally schedules a Jobsite Inspection. The Jobsite Inspection serves two purposes: 1. To give the contractor an opportunity to inspect the complaint items; and 2. To give the Registrar an opportunity to determine if the contractor’s work violates Arizona law.

Jobsite Inspection Rights and Responsibilities Access to inspect: The property owner has complete control over who they allow on the property. However, if the Registrar’s investigator or the contractor cannot inspect the work, the Registrar will not move forward with a citation.

Cooperation: Arizona law enables injured parties to seek relief for damages through several paths. When dealing with a licensed contractor, the Registrar of Contractors’ administrative complaint process may serve as one of those possible paths. However, in order to use that path, the Registrar relies on the cooperation of all parties to a complaint.

Minimum workmanship: The Registrar investigates workmanship complaints for compliance with minimum workmanship and professional industry standards. The Registrar does not issue citations for work that meets these standards.

Scope: The scope of the Jobsite Inspection is limited to items listed in the complaint filed with the Registrar’s office. It is the complainant’s responsibility to point out the complaint item(s) and the Investigators role to review the item(s). If the complainant identifies additional workmanship items not listed in the original complaint, they must file an addendum to the complaint. The Registrar’s Investigator may identify additional administrative violations by the contractor (e.g. work performed out of scope of the license and failure to provide a contract that meets requirements set by Arizona law) at the time of the inspection.

The Role of the Investigator At the Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s investigator will: ● Only investigate the items listed on the complaint form filed with the Registrar. ● Will gather evidence to make an informed decision about the complaint items.

What to expect after a Jobsite Inspection After doing a Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s Investigator will leave the jobsite and review the evidence provided during the inspection. Generally, the investigator does not make any determination at the time of the jobsite inspection regarding whether the allegations listed in the complaint are supported. ● If the allegations are confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator may issue a Written Directive telling the contractor to correct the poor or incomplete work. ● If the allegations are not confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator will close the complaint.

Questions? If you have already filed a complaint and it was assigned to an investigator, you are encouraged to contact that investigator directly with the information listed in your jobsite inspection letter.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 If you have not filed a complaint yet or have not been assigned an investigator, you can reach the Registrar’s compliance department at (877) 692-9762.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 A Guide to Written Directives Purpose of the Jobsite Inspection When the Registrar receives a complaint against a contractor’s license, the Registrar generally schedules a Jobsite Inspection. The Jobsite Inspection serves two purposes: 1. To give the contractor an opportunity to inspect the complaint items; and 2. To give the Registrar an opportunity to determine if the contractor’s work violates Arizona law.

What to expect after a Jobsite Inspection After doing a Jobsite Inspection, the Registrar’s Investigator will determine whether the allegations listed in the complaint are supported. ● If the allegations are confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator may issue a Written Directive telling the contractor to correct the poor or incomplete work. ● If the allegations are not confirmed, the Registrar’s Investigator will close the complaint.

Written Directives Access: In order to use the administrative process offered by the Registrar, a property owner must provide reasonable access to allow the contractor to fix their work as directed by the Registrar in a Written Directive. Complainants may not put any additional, unnecessary restrictions on the Respondent above and beyond the initial contract requirements agreed upon at the beginning of the project. Respondents are required to make repairs on items identified on any Written Directive, not otherwise restricted by local code or HOA limitations. Complainants must make access available to the Respondent to make the required repairs and failure to provide reasonable access may result in the Registrar dismissing the complaint.

Contractor obligations: The Written Directive will set a deadline for compliance. This is the period of time determined by the Investigator as necessary to complete the items listed in the Directive. ● The deadline for compliance assumes the contractor will promptly begin working on the items listed in the Directive. ● Do not wait. Both parties should communicate quickly to schedule the work.

Extensions: If good cause exists to extend this deadline, either party may submit a written request to the Investigator. The Registrar will review requests for extension and determine if the Directive should be extended.

Manner and method of performance: The Registrar does not provide specific instructions for how to correct poor work. A licensed contractor is expected to have the skill and professionalism to complete the work. Moreover, the complainant may not dictate the manner of repair. If the contractor fails to appropriately correct the work according to the contract, the Registrar will issue a citation.

Compliance Inspection: After the Written Directive expires, the Registrar’s Investigator will contact the complainant to determine if the contractor performed any corrective work. ● If the contractor did corrective work, the Investigator may schedule a Compliance Inspection to determine if the poor work is corrected. ● If the contractor did not perform any corrective work, the Registrar’s Investigator will not do a Compliance Inspection and will determine whether to issue a citation based on the administrative record.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Work performed after the directive ends: After the Directive period ends, a property owner may choose to allow the contractor to continue its work. The Registrar encourages parties to work cooperatively, but cannot require a homeowner to continue to allow a contractor access to the property after the Directive period ends in order for the administrative process to continue. Denying access after the Directive ends is not grounds to close or dismiss a complaint.

Questions? If you have already filed a complaint and it was assigned to an investigator, you are encouraged to contact that investigator directly with the information listed in your jobsite inspection letter. If you have not filed a complaint yet or have not been assigned an investigator, you can reach the Registrar’s compliance department at (877) 692-9762.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 (DELETE THIS ADDRESS/PAGE IF NOT WARRANTED) License mailing address (if different from account/company address of record):

Esplendor's Home Building LLC

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 (DELETE THIS ADDRESS/PAGE IF NOT WARRANTED)

Complainant Attorney:

,

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 (DELETE THIS ADDRESS/PAGE IF NOT WARRANTED)

Respondent Attorney:

,

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C008 05/21 Arizona Registrar of Contractors Jobsite Inspection Notes Case No.: 2023-10443 Investigator: Greg Johndrow #195 Inspection Date: 10/12/2023 Inspection Time: 9:30AM

Complainant: Guillermo Amarillas Respondent: Esplendor’s Home Building LLC

Overview of project: New residential construction General Notes: The site inspection was performed on this date and time with both parties present. In attendance with the complainant was Enedina Amarillas (spouse) and present for the respondent was Luis Renteria. Also present was ROC Investigator Hammons. Photos taken with agency issued Canon PowerShot ELPH180. Audio recorded with agency issued Olympus recorder.

Complaint Item 1: “Breach of contract” Investigator’s Observations: This allegation is NOT verified. In response to this complaint item: There is not sufficient evidence to verify a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). Governing Rule: N/A

Complaint Item 2: “Finish job was agreed to complete with in 306 working days” Investigator’s Observations: Verified. The status of the construction, as of this inspection date, is 574 days from the permit issuance and 268 days past the completion date stated in the contract, under Article Three. The work listed in the 4th payment draw has not been completed, although the draw has been paid in full, as stated in the respondent’s complaint response. The Respondent shall complete project per original contract agreement, properly executed change orders, verbal agreements, local building codes and manufacturers installation instructions. Governing Rule: A.R.S. § 32-1154 (A)(3) - R4-9-108(a): Violation of any rule adopted by the registrar; Namely R 4-9-108(a) A contractor shall perform work in a professional and workmanlike manner. And A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108 (B): a contractor shall use such skills, prudence, and diligence in performing and completing tasks undertaken that the completed work meets the standards of a similarly licensed contractor possessing ordinary skill and capacity.

Complaint Item 3: “Payments installments agreed to be done according to the job completed.” Investigator’s Observations: This allegation is NOT verified. In response to this complaint item: There is not sufficient evidence to verify a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). Governing Rule: N/A

Complaint Item 4: “Mr. Luis Renteria "Esplendor’s" Requested to paid 4 instalments of total cost of 5 instalments.” Investigator’s Observations: This allegation is NOT verified. In response to this complaint item: There is not sufficient evidence to verify a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). Governing Rule: N/A

RCC100 11/14

Arizona Registrar of Contractors Jobsite Inspection Notes Complaint Item 5: “Mr. Luis Renteria "Esplendor’s" Refuses to commit to job completion date.” Investigator’s Observations: Verified. The respondent’s work is 268 days past the completion date listed in the contract. The respondent could not provide a completion date at the time of this inspection. The Respondent shall complete project per original contract agreement, properly executed change orders, verbal agreements, local building codes and manufacturers installation instructions. Governing Rule: A.R.S. § 32-1154 (A)(3) - R4-9-108(a): Violation of any rule adopted by the registrar; Namely R 4-9-108(a) A contractor shall perform work in a professional and workmanlike manner. And A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108 (B): a contractor shall use such skills, prudence, and diligence in performing and completing tasks undertaken that the completed work meets the standards of a similarly licensed contractor possessing ordinary skill and capacity.

Complaint Item 6: “Mr. Luis Renteria "Esplendor’s" Refuses to communicate or meet in person to answer questios o give any status of the job site.” Investigator’s Observations: This allegation is NOT verified. In response to this complaint item: There is not sufficient evidence to verify a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). Governing Rule: N/A

ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS In addition to the allegations in the complaint, the following violations were verified:

Warning Letter: Elements of a Contract. Investigator’s Observations: The respondent’s contract is missing the following information: • Information about the customer’s right to file a complaint with the registrar • 9b: The contract shall contain the registrar's telephone number and website address and shall state that complaints must be made within the applicable time period as set forth in section 32-1155, subsection A. Governing Rule: A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(12), Namely A.R.S. § 32-1158(A) Minimum Elements of a Contract. REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION: The respondent is to submit a copy of a current contract form that complies with the provisions of A.R.S. § 32-1158

RCC100 11/14

Picture 1 Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 10/12/2023 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

Front of the residence and the current status of the project, 268 days after the estimated completion date, 574 day from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 2 Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 10/12/2023 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 268 days after the estimated completion date, 574 day from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 3 Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 10/12/2023 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 268 days after the estimated completion date, 574 day from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 4 Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 10/12/2023 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 268 days after the estimated completion date, 574 day from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 5 Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 10/12/2023 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 268 days after the estimated completion date, 574 day from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 6 Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 10/12/2023 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 268 days after the estimated completion date, 574 day from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 7 Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 10/12/2023 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 268 days after the estimated completion date, 574 day from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 8 Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 10/12/2023 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 268 days after the estimated completion date, 574 day from the issuance of the building permit. Complainant: Guillermo Amarillas 299 Camino Panama Rio Rico, AZ 85648

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C009 04/21 Respondent: Esplendor's Home Building LLC 407 Rio Rico Dr. Rio Rico, AZ 85648

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C009 04/21 October 19, 2023

License No. ROC 219516

Re: Complaint No. 2023-10443

WRITTEN DIRECTIVE FROM THE REGISTRAR

Dear Respondent:

After investigation, the Registrar determined that you failed to meet the requirements of A.R.S. § 32- 1154(A), and now issues this Directive requiring you to take appropriate corrective action. Failure to comply with this Directive constitutes a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(22) and may result in the issuance of a citation, discipline of your license, and a civil penalty pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-1154(E) of up to $500.00. You must notify the Registrar’s assigned Investigator of your compliance with this Directive prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2023.

RESTRICTIONS • You may not perform or hire other contractors to perform work that is outside the scope of your license. • If your license is currently suspended for administrative reasons 1, or is inactive, expired, or cancelled, you may not perform any corrective work nor contract in any manner, which includes hiring other contractors to perform work, until the suspension of your license(s) has been lifted or your license(s) has been reactivated.

DIRECTIVE REQUIREMENTS You are directed to remedy the following violations by the appropriate means:

Complaint Item 2: “Finish job was agreed to complete with in 306 working days” Investigator’s Observations: Verified. The status of the construction, as of this inspection date, is 574 days from the permit issuance and 268 days past the completion date stated in the contract, under Article Three. The work listed in the 4th payment draw has not been completed, although the draw has been paid in full, as stated in the respondent’s complaint response. The Respondent shall complete project per original contract agreement, properly executed change orders, verbal agreements, local building codes and manufacturers installation instructions. Governing Rule: A.R.S. § 32-1154 (A)(3) - R4-9-108(a): Violation of any rule adopted by the registrar; Namely R 4-9-108(a) A contractor shall perform work in a professional and workmanlike manner. And A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108 (B): a contractor shall use such skills, prudence, and diligence in performing and completing tasks undertaken that the completed work meets the standards of a similarly licensed contractor possessing ordinary skill and capacity.

This means the license is suspended for lack of qualifying party, lack of bond, nonrenewal, Recovery Fund payout, or for any reason listed in A.R.S. § 32-1124(F). 1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C009 04/21 Complaint Item 5: “Mr. Luis Renteria "Esplendor’s" Refuses to commit to job completion date.” Investigator’s Observations: Verified. The respondent’s work is 268 days past the completion date listed in the contract. The respondent could not provide a completion date at the time of this inspection. The Respondent shall complete project per original contract agreement, properly executed change orders, verbal agreements, local building codes and manufacturers installation instructions. Governing Rule: A.R.S. § 32-1154 (A)(3) - R4-9-108(a): Violation of any rule adopted by the registrar; Namely R 4-9-108(a) A contractor shall perform work in a professional and workmanlike manner. And A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108 (B): a contractor shall use such skills, prudence, and diligence in performing and completing tasks undertaken that the completed work meets the standards of a similarly licensed contractor possessing ordinary skill and capacity.

ITEMS NOT REQUIRING CORRECTION The following complaint items require no action by the Respondent:

Complaint Item 1: “Breach of contract” Investigator’s Observations: This allegation is NOT verified. In response to this complaint item: There is not sufficient evidence to verify a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). Governing Rule: N/A

Complaint Item 3: “Payments installments agreed to be done according to the job completed.” Investigator’s Observations: This allegation is NOT verified. In response to this complaint item: There is not sufficient evidence to verify a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). Governing Rule: N/A

Complaint Item 4: “Mr. Luis Renteria "Esplendor’s" Requested to paid 4 instalments of total cost of 5 instalments.” Investigator’s Observations: This allegation is NOT verified. In response to this complaint item: There is not sufficient evidence to verify a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). Governing Rule: N/A

Complaint Item 6: “Mr. Luis Renteria "Esplendor’s" Refuses to communicate or meet in person to answer questios o give any status of the job site.” Investigator’s Observations: This allegation is NOT verified. In response to this complaint item: There is not sufficient evidence to verify a violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). Governing Rule: N/A

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C009 04/21 Please direct all questions regarding this Directive to the undersigned Investigator.

Sincerely,

Gregory Johndrow Gregory Johndrow, Investigator #195 (520) 628-6896 [email redacted] 1700 W. Washington St., Ste. 105 Phoenix, Arizona 85007

CC: Complainant

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C009 04/21 Complainant: Guillermo Amarillas 299 Camino Panama Rio Rico, AZ 85648

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov

C012 05/21 Respondent: Esplendor's Home Building LLC 407 Rio Rico Dr. Rio Rico, AZ 85648

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov

C012 05/21 December 4, 2023

Compliance Jobsite Inspection Notice Re: Complaint No. 2023-10443

Dear Complainant and Respondent:

A Compliance Inspection has been scheduled for December 7, 2023 at 08:30 AM to determine the current status of the items listed on the issued Directive.

The Complainant is required to be present for this inspection. The Respondent is encouraged to be present but is not required to attend.

Complainant: SAFE ACCESS IS REQUIRED TO ANY AREA TO BE INSPECTED.

Sincerely,

Gregory Johndrow Gregory Johndrow, Investigator #195 (520) 628-6896 [email redacted] 1700 W. Washington St., Ste. 105 Phoenix, Arizona 85007

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov

C012 05/21 Complainant: Guillermo Amarillas 299 Camino Panama Rio Rico, AZ 85648

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C013 4/21 Respondent: Esplendor's Home Building LLC 407 Rio Rico Dr. Rio Rico, AZ 85648

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C013 4/21 Case No.: 2023-10443 Investigator: Gregory Johndrow Inspection Date: December 7, 2023 Inspection Time: 08:30 AM

Compliance Jobsite Inspection General Notes: The site inspection was performed on this date and time. The respondent was not present for this inspection. This Compliance Inspection was to evaluate the current conditions of items requiring corrective action as stated on the Directive. Those items are listed below.

Compliance Findings: The respondent has not taken appropriate corrective action to comply with the Directive. Governing Rule: A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(22): Failure to take appropriate corrective action to comply with this chapter or with the rules adopted pursuant to this chapter…

As stated on Directive: Complaint Item 2: “Finish job was agreed to complete with in 306 working days” Investigator’s Observation from initial inspection: Verified. The status of the construction, as of this inspection date, is 574 days from the permit issuance and 268 days past the completion date stated in the contract, under Article Three. The work listed in the 4th payment draw has not been completed, although the draw has been paid in full, as stated in the respondent’s complaint response. The Respondent shall complete project per original contract agreement, properly executed change orders, verbal agreements, local building codes and manufacturers installation instructions. Compliance Inspection Findings for this item: This has NOT been corrected. During the 49 days from the issuance of the written directive to this compliance inspection, the respondent only installed 1 room of drywall, the 1 room was not fully completed. The stucco work was in progress the day of this inspection, this work began the day prior to this inspection, 5 days after the deadline for the written directive. The respondent has failed to taken any other action. The current status is 317 days past the completion date stated in the contract and 623 days from the issuance of the permit. The respondent has failed to follow their construction completion schedule, provided to the investigator prior to the written directive being issued and has failed to meet compliance with the written directive.

As stated on Directive: Complaint Item 5: “Mr. Luis Renteria "Esplendor’s" Refuses to commit to job completion date.” Investigator’s Observation from initial inspection: Investigator’s Observations: Verified. The respondent’s work is 268 days past the completion date listed in the contract. The respondent could not provide a completion date at the time of this inspection. The Respondent shall complete project per original contract agreement, properly executed change orders, verbal agreements, local building codes and manufacturers installation instructions. Compliance Inspection Findings for this item: This has NOT been corrected. The current status is 317 days past the completion date stated in the contract and 623 days from the issuance of the permit. The respondent has failed to follow their construction completion schedule, provided to the investigator prior to the written directive being issued and has failed to meet compliance with the written directive.

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C013 4/21 Note:

Please review the complaint items listed above. If any of the items have not been corrected at the time of the compliance inspection this complaint will be forwarded to the Registrar’s legal department and a citation may be issued.

If all items are corrected after receipt of this letter, please notify the Registrar’s legal department by sending a notice of compliance signed by the complainant to fax number (602) 364-0416 or by mail to: Arizona Registrar of Contractors, P.O. Box 18244, Phoenix, Arizona 85005-8244. Sincerely,

Gregory Johndrow Gregory Johndrow, Investigator #195 (520) 628-6896 [email redacted] 1700 W. Washington St., Ste. 105 Phoenix, Arizona 85007

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov C013 4/21 Picture 1 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

Front of the residence and the current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 2 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 3 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 4 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 5 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 6 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 7 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 8 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. Picture 9 Compliance Jobsite Inspection Photos

Case: 2023-10443 Date: 12-7-23 Address: 1721 Moon Ct; Rio Rico, AZ 85648

The current status of the project, 49 days from the issuance of the written directive, 317 days after the estimated completion date, and 623 days from the issuance of the building permit. REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Guillermo Amarillas, Case No. 2023-10443

COMPLAINANT, v. CITATION Esplendor's Home Building LLC, License No. ROC 219516,

RESPONDENT.

The Registrar issues this Citation to Esplendor's Home Building LLC, (“Respondent”) under A.R.S. § 32-1155(A). If Respondent fails to answer this Citation by January 3, 2024, then under A.R.S. § 32-1155(C), Respondent’s failure to answer may be deemed an admission of the act or acts charged in the underlying complaint, and the Registrar may then suspend or revoke Respondent’s license(s). THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT On September 7, 2023, Guillermo Amarillas, (“Complainant”) filed a written complaint with the Registrar. A copy of that Complaint is attached to this Citation. A FORMAL STATEMENT OF THE CHARGES AGAINST RESPONDENT The Registrar investigated this matter and finds cause to charge Respondent with violation(s) of Title 32, Chapter 10 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Respondent is charged with violating: Charge :1 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108(a) Violation of any rule adopted by the Registrar; Namely A.A.C. R4-9-108(a): A contractor shall perform all work in a professional and workmanlike manner. of 6

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 Charge :2 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(3) - R4-9-108(b) Violation of any rule adopted by the Registrar; Namely A.A.C. R4-9-108(b): A contractor shall perform all work in accordance with any applicable building codes and professional industry standards. For work to be performed in accordance with professional industry standards, a contractor shall use such skills, prudence, and diligence in performing and completing tasks undertaken that the completed work meets the standards of a similarly licensed contractor possessing ordinary skill and capacity. Charge :3 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(12) - A.R.S. § 32-1158 Failure in any material respect to comply with this chapter; Namely A.R.S. § 32- 1158. Charge :4 A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(22) Failure to take appropriate corrective action to comply with this chapter or with rules adopted pursuant to this chapter without valid justification within a reasonable period of time after receiving a written directive from the Registrar. The written directive shall set forth the time within which the contractor is to complete the remedial action. The time permitted for compliance shall not be less than fifteen days from the date of issuance of the directive. A license shall not be revoked or suspended nor shall any other penalty be imposed for a violation of this paragraph until after a hearing has been held. If the matter proceeds to a hearing and the administrative law judge determines that any of the charges listed above are supported by a preponderance of the evidence, then Respondent’s license(s) may be subject to suspension or revocation, and Respondent may be subject to other penalties provided by law, including civil penalties under A.R.S. §§ 32-1154(E) and (F). of 6

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 FILING A WRITTEN ANSWER Respondent must appear by filing with the Registrar a written answer to the citation and complaint showing cause, if any, why Respondent’s license(s) should not be suspended or revoked. A.R.S. § 32-1155(A). Respondent’s written answer should contain the heading “Written Answer to Citation and Complaint” and should include the case number, which is Case No. 2023-10443. How to File a Written Answer: Respondent’s written answer may be submitted in the following ways: In-Person: 1700 W. Washington St., Ste. 105, Phoenix, Arizona, 85007-2812 Mail: P.O. Box 18244, Phoenix, Arizona, 85005-8244 Email: [email redacted] The Registrar’s normal office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If Respondent submits a written answer by mail, it is not filed with the Registrar until the Registrar actually receives it. Deadline for Filing a Written Answer: Respondent must file a written answer with the Registrar no later than January 3, 2024. This deadline is calculated under A.R.S. §§ 32-1155(A) and (B), which provides a deadline ten days after service of the Citation. Service of the Citation and Complaint is complete five days after the Registrar mails a copy of the Citation and Complaint to Respondent’s latest address of record in the Registrar’s office. Consequences for Failing to File a Written Answer: If Respondent fails to answer, Respondent’s failure may be deemed an admission of the act or acts charged in the written complaint. A.R.S. § 32-1155(C). The Registrar may then suspend or revoke Respondent’s license(s).

of 6

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING If Respondent files a timely written answer contesting any charges in the Complaint, then the Registrar will request the Office of Administrative Hearings set a date for an administrative hearing and will notify all the parties at least 30 days before that hearing. A.R.S. § 41-1092.05(D). INVESTIGATOR’S APPEARANCE AS A WITNESS The Registrar’s assigned investigator will appear as a witness at the hearing. If either party demands the attendance at the hearing of any other person, that party must obtain and serve a subpoena in compliance with the rules and processes established by the Office of Administrative Hearings.

RESPONDENT’S RIGHT TO REQUEST AN INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Under A.R.S. § 41-1092.06, if Respondent submits a request to the Registrar for an informal settlement conference, the Registrar must hold a conference within 15 days after receiving the request. Respondent’s request for an informal settlement conference must be in writing and must be filed no later than 20 days before the administrative hearing. A.R.S. § 41- 1092.06(A). The Registrar will not close or settle any case without both parties’ appearance at the Settlement Conference. The parties participating in the settlement conference must have the authority to settle the case and must waive their right to object to the participation of the Registrar’s settlement conference representative in the final administrative decision. A.R.S. § 41-1092.06(B). Any statements, either written or oral, made by the parties at the conference, including a written document, created or expressed solely for the purpose of settlement negotiations, are inadmissible in the administrative hearing. A.R.S. § 41-1092.06(B). of 6

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 RESPONDENT’S PRIOR RECORD Under A.A.C. R4-9-117, in determining the appropriate discipline, the administrative law judge and the Registrar may consider not only facts in the current case, but also facts in prior cases and any documents regarding Respondent on file with the Registrar. Respondent’s prior disciplinary record and current license(s) status may be considered as a mitigating or aggravating factor in determining the appropriate discipline. EVIDENTIARY DISCLAIMER By issuing this Citation, the Registrar is directing Respondent to file a written answer to the Citation and Complaint, showing cause, if any, why Respondent’s license(s) should not be suspended or revoked. A.R.S. § 32-1155(A). This Citation does not constitute proof that any charge or allegation in Complainant’s written complaint is in fact true. This Citation does not constitute proof that Respondent violated any statutory provision or rule adopted by the Registrar. Dated December 19, 2023.

By: /s/ Gail Mathews Gail Mathews Legal Assistant II Legal Department Arizona Registrar of Contractors COPY of the foregoing mailed by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, December 19, 2023 to: Respondent Certified Mail No: [number redacted]

Esplendor's Home Building LLC 407 Rio Rico Dr. Rio Rico, AZ 85648

of 6

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 Copy mailed by USPS First Class mail this same date to: Esplendor's Home Building LLC 407 Rio Rico Dr. Rio Rico, AZ 85648

Esplendor's Home Building LLC P O Box 4729 Rio Rico, AZ 85648 Complainant Guillermo Amarillas 299 Camino Panama Rio Rico, AZ 85648 Copy sent electronically this same date to: Respondent at email address on record with the Registrar Complainant at email address on record with the Registrar

Case No. 2023-10443

of 6

1700 W. Washington Street, Suite 105 · Phoenix AZ 85007-2812

602.542.1525 · Toll Free 877.692.9762 · roc.az.gov Lg101 8/21 Licensed Complaint Form Departmental Use Only For Current or Suspended Licensees

Person Filing Complaint Full Name (First Middle Last) Business Name (if a licensed contractor or supplier) ROC License Number(s) (if any)

Guillermo Edgardo Amarillas Mailing Address (Enter jobsite in Contract/Project section) City State Zip

299 Camino Panama Rio Rico Arizona 85648 Phone Number Email

[number redacted] [email redacted] I consent to receive communications electronically in connection with this case Name of Attorney (if any)

Street Address of Attorney City State Zip

Phone Number of Attorney Email of Attorney

Contractor Information Name (as shown on contract/invoice) ROC License Number(s)

Esplendor's Home Building LLC ROC 219516 Street Address City State Zip

407 Rio Rico Dr. Rio Rico Arizona 85648 Phone Number Email

[number redacted] [email redacted] Name of Person(s) Representing License

Luis Renterias Contract/Project Information Contract Date Contract Amount Amount Paid

November 27, 2021 $249,000.00 $199,200.00 Date Work Started Date Work Stopped Date Work Was Completed

March 22, 2022 August 1, 2023 Close of Escrow (New Home) Move-In Date (New-Home)

September 15, 2022 September 16, 2022 Jobsite Street Address City State Zip

1721 Moon Ct. Rio Rico AZ 85648 Name of Construction Site Owner Construction Site Name (if applicable)

Guillermo Edgardo Amarillas Phone Number of Construction Site Owner Email of Construction Site Owner

[email redacted] This complaint is for Other I have contacted the contractor by Phone/Text Have you filed a complaint in court? No

RCC099 12/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Licensed Complaint Form Departmental Use Only For Current or Suspended Licensees

Has any work been corrected? No

The contract was Both All change orders were Oral This project was Residential This project involved New Home

A building permit was obtained by Contractor 22-0257 Santa ruz county List and briefly describe each complaint item (Please do not write "see attached" or use additional pages unless necessary to further describe issues or list more complaint items) (limited to 100 characters per line)

Breach of contract; Finish job was agreed to complete with in 306 working days.; Paytments installments agreed to be done acording to the job completed.; Mr. Luis Renterias "Esplenders" Requested to paid 4 instalments of total cost of 5 instalments.; Mr. Luis Renterias "Esplenders" Refuses to commit to job complition date.; Mr. Luis Renterias "Esplenders" Refuses to comunicate or meet in person to answer questios o give any status of the job site.

Signature I declare under penalty of perjury that the information and documents contained on this Complaint Form, included with this complaint, or hereafter submitted in support of this complaint are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I will assist in the investigation or in the prosecution of the contractor or other parties, and will, if necessary, attend hearings and testify to facts. Printed Name Signature Date

Guillermo Edgardo Amarillas \complainant1\ \complainantd1\

RCC099 12/05/18 Page 2 of 2 wrurroldrz q1M paonpo.rd Lrr65=01-ofqzrm 9086-08e (008) 'S00Bt ue6rqcry!'drqsumoj uolurlO'peou alr!.! uaagrl 9Z0gL C-1'l'taNsurol fU x.l7 OUBVIVJ urprl?.rD f ur.rolD ggzl-llt ^q :xu.{ 0001-L/t:ouorld llrgsll ZV orrU orX "py eiuluo.rg A\ tZZl oory ory,,sr;u3op-,(19::ry iuol 0t,totfcvd u3^n8 UlAnS v e0/L1A urrotEVVo ultlls urr-rf s :slerlrul :slerlrul './' sse-zge sour-l ut se uorlellacue3 o] ns l3erluoS aq] 6uugpuar ']celluoc 0, . -'- ! slqt lo qcParq lellaleLu e alnlrlsuoo IIM MorcsS Jto asolC palnpaqcs aLtrl Iq lcprluoC sul ,o suorlrpuoc pue sulel eq] qlM ,i;dLuoc o1 CrL ,{ped ,{ue }o aJnltej arll leql ser6e Ilssajdxa }oerluoC str..l} o} so[Jed aLlI .sluauncop at{t ,o uolleplo.ar sE pauryap oq llEtls /noJcsg 'Be lo osol9 aql ]eql aor0e lo^ng pue rallag reAng pue telles lo ]uauaar6e lenlnu ualJu^\ solnbal alep 6urso;c tarltee Iuy LL (u,,tivctoy,l) ^qoJot1 e00z/0t/zo uo /solcsa asolc pue lceJluo3 srql Jo suorlrpuoc pue surol 11e qlma fldLuoc llt/v\ Ja^ng pue ]alles :aleo 6utsol3 gE '9e '+,C $ t0 Ii{OUDSS gO rJ ry'v'r'r'v's o,t srev^vdl xcsHo s,ugrHsvc Eo r[uod Nr 00.000.8 $ 'a^oqP paleclpur se Aeuou ]sauJef 00'00s 9L $ 'elnllaf o] o1 lcafqns eq llPqs r(auou lsaurea lle pue ']cerluoc slq] lo rlceolq letJoleut e 00 se panllsuos oq lleqs 'suollcos 6utitrlo;1o1 aq] ]o ur paqucsap se ueql laqlo Morcsf Jo asolo palnpaq3s 6Z ^ue oql Iq spunl parlnbar aLl] IBd ol o.rnlteJ leq) sabpelmoulce lo^ng Molaq pautllno se pred .actrd osprlcJnd llnJ 00'00s'B $ 8Z '(lttr rEvL-Nvlrcu=l l lo AI_NVUUVAA ANV 'uorlelrurl tnoqlrm 'Ourpnlcur) perldurr .ro ssatdxa .pur1 ,{ue }o INVUUVA ON S:yvy\l Uf llf S pue ,Sf ONVUgy\nCNf UO SNjll 9Z ,an;en fuelauou NV lO UV:1C 6NV :lUJ 'NglllCNOC S1_SV ut ou r.1ltm paJra]supr] aq lleqs uroJoLl papnlour ,{yedotd ;euostad leuotltppv Y/N :papnlcul [yado.r6 leuosJad 6u11s;x3 leuolltppV VZ ,.'NOIJ_IONOC Sl SV,, ul poloJsuerl 6ulaq ete pue leluoplcur 'c7 ZZ I;eleu ele Iyedo.r6 aql uo slueuloaotdtut pue saJnlxg Iuy 'puel luece^ se r$.redo.r4 eq1 Eulseqctnd st JeIng :sluoLuololdrul leluoplcul ,IZ 'n7 6I ,IOT '69? XCOTS ',9T SEJVTSS ODrU OrU uogducsep ;e6e1 ,6 0 - 0z - sTT :#s,rossassv 8t 'T U?95U :apoa dq'79 LrNnoc znuc v.r,NYs :11uno3 ()JI'T OIE Iltc LI u,{s 6uruo7 ral Nooxl L ii L I :ssarppV IUadold 'or '(.fuedotd,, eq1 [;er;1ce;1oc) nolaq peqr.rcsap Ipedord leuosrad sn;d'o1ereq1 lelueprcut sacueuepndde 'g;. pue uoeJeql slueuenoldutt pue sernlx!, lle pue lpedo.rd leel eql eseqctnd o1 seetoe .relng :.ragg pue uo11d;.rcseg Iyedo.rg .y1, USJJO (iNoHdrtlr) (:coc:crrro) (ylutr ro f y\vN l-Ntud) 'tt (u,.r.lvolon) (:unrvrucrs s,Nosu3dsf tvs) I-Nf CV CNV f S,NOSU:IdSf IVS INIUd) ''{VN :[g panracag ZL :i{uedr"uo3 l\olcsf :rll!A - vI.I. :r{euoy1 }sauJej tr uu'u09 $ ]saulef tl luno3cv lsnJl s,laIoJB 'c 'q e tl pelrsoda6 Icaqc leuosrad ]o r.urol lo lunoLUV OI '/noloq pequcsep {yedot6 eql lo1 ecud eseqclnd aq11o yed oq o} poroptsuoc b st Ieuoul lseuleo lle 1e B 'ularaq paprnotd asl/v\Jeqlo sselun 'ggt-Zgt soutl o1 luenstnd lceJluoC stql lacuec {1e1erpeu.rur ,uorldo s,rel;eg ',{eul :e;1ag 'uoseol Iue lo; patouoqs;p sr Ieuou.r isouJee roJ loor1c ,{ue;1 'arnlrapol ol }cafqns sr [euou: ]sauea Iue 'gce.r1uo3 stq] saqceaJq )_ ler{ng 1t '1eq1 sealbe .raIng Iuedu.loc /rlolcsa pasuacrl llnp e qlrrvr 1r ysodep pue asrnocal }noqlr/vr lcoqc aq} asJopua Jo lunocce }sru} 'o s,ralorg ul lcaqc aql ltsodep lelo.lg 'Jslorg o] elqeled sr lcor]c aq t| elqeled st lcaLlc otl] t.lcil.l/yr o1 Iueduuoc /v\ojoso lue q1tr,n treuou ^eur JoIoJE 'acueldocce uodl 'paldecce s! JaJJo I lsaurea eq1 ltsodep Illdttlo.td lleLls lpun rololg ,{q ppq aq lleqs lauou lseute3 :{auoy1; lsaulef b rallos pue ra,{ng aq1 q}oq E] ro l^;aarsnlcxa lollos orl} ro :I;anrsn;cxa relng eq1 E L f] :(euo lceqc) 1o 1ue6e arll sr gl,outl uo paueu to)iorg :uolleu.rr;uo3 [cua6y Z (..raIng..) svTTlurilitv ENIcgN :rxorl pa^rarau I rdt3cSu 'tai(ng pue.ra;1eg aq1 [q palncaxa aq ]snu puel pop!^lpqnsun lo papt^rpqns 6urpre6al unpuappv ue pue palnbe.r eq [;leraue6 llran yodar crlqnd e 'slol alou lo I suryro oqaa uostad e "a'! 'Jopr^tpqns e fiq p;os 6uraq sr (sarce 69; oi sarce gti puel paprnrpqniun io (satce gg uiqri ssal) puel pap;rupqns lllNnl 80dd0 tNisn0H tvn0l I9VUINOS SSVHSUNd IO'I/ONVI INVSVN L fCVd Santa County MAR 17 Santa Cruz 150 N Congress 206, Building M 85621 ) 375-7S80 http://www

22-0257 PROJECT NAME: ctLLERtUO EDGARDO EW A|\/ARIILAS SITE ADDRESS: 1721 r\,,tOON Ci'rilSErco ISSUED: 7t2022 IF NOT D EXPIRES: 6t2024

2150

PARCEL: i15200s4 SUBDIVISION TEXT: SUB RIo LOT: U N IT NO. tl 14 OF BLK BLOCK:

APPLICANT: AMARILLASGUILLERMoEDGARDo ,1611 PARCEL E SHARL STREET GUILLERMO QUEEN CREEK, AZ 85243 OWNER: 1611 E STREET QUEEN AZ 85243

DUAL RESIDENCE/SMALL COMMERCIAL: ESPLENDOR'S HOIVE BUILDING LLC 235 CIRCULO CERRO License:219516 RIO RICO, AZ 85648 Expires: 0SlZ1l2O2Z 520-3 1 3-3034

VALUATIONS: FEES: Garage, Barns, Storage, Paid Due Swimming pools 596.00 $30,562.88 Building Permit Fee $1,7Bo.oo $o.oo Zoning Clearance Fee Porch 208.00 $50.00 $o.oo $s,120.00 Driveway Fee R-3 VB Residential, one- $ 1 32.00 $0.00 1602.00 $209, 1 S9.1 6 and two-family

Total: 9242,872.04 Total Due: $0,00 PROJEcT DESCRtpTtON: RES-NEW (t\4ODEL)

THE SAME TO BE TRUE OF WORK WI BE DOES NOT UME TO OR LOCAL LAW RE ON THIS PE IT GIVES . THIS PERMIT IF

OF I D AG ENT /ORBU ILDER

Printed by : Cecilia Huerta on:03117i202204t25 pNl

[number redacted]ÿ4740ÿ89 ÿÿ ÿ9 ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿÿReceived ÿÿ1 140 !!Legal 12/29/2023 :;<=>?<ÿAÿ:BCDEÿFG;<=>?<H?IJKGLKMINO

P?QRR >;ÿ ÿ # :;<=>? ÿR IÿEQ RGR QI;ÿ G;Sÿ EITUV GQ;R ÿEG<>ÿ WIK ÿXYXZA [Y\\Z ><UV>;SI?]<ÿ^IT>ÿ_`QVSQ;MÿaaEÿb " %3#c" $d 05ÿ2 $ÿ135ÿ1 14ÿ ÿ007!!ÿ9 e7ÿf c$#8fÿb  c$#8d 8 ÿ ÿ

quot; ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿÿ ÿÿ1 140 !!4ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ e" -ÿg35 ÿ ! *ÿ'ÿ'$ÿ2 'ÿ'$5ÿhÿ,6i!, j61 kÿ11411 ÿÿj k " %3#c" $

ÿ ÿ ÿ P?QRR>;ÿ:;<=>?ÿ[lX[ÿmII;ÿERKKUSn i4o

" 722 ##$2 2%2&'(')*

amp;4"'+&,(+-+.8$/1%01401%20#23224-56,0$64$6$7857 
quot;5 7  "9 020 Received Legal 12/29/2023

“Written Answer to Citation and Complaint”

Case No. 2023-10443

Respondent’s license(s) should not be suspended or revoked. A.R.S. § 32-1155(A).

Esplendor’s Home Building LLC. has been a hardworking company for the past seventeen years. The company is processing some hardships momentarily that currently we are focusing on completing new home constructions on a reasonable timeframe.

The past seventeen years Esplendor’s Home Building LLC has not had any complaints on these kinds of issues.

There were numerous factors that paid part in this unforeseen new home construction delay, such as pandemic, and shortage on subcontractors in the area.

Currently as the general contractor, it is our responsibility to take control and action to finish new home constructions within a reasonable period of time.

We currently have an estimated completion schedule; it will be adjusted due to pandemic and shortage of subcontractors.

We apologize for any inconveniences we have caused the owner on the delay of the construction.

Thank you,

Esplendor’s Home Building LLC. Mediation Notice

Mediation Services Mediation services are available to the parties. What is Mediation? Mediation is a method of resolving disputes where the parties can end conflict without the expense and time associated with the full administrative process. Who Participates in During mediation, a mediator will attempt to help the Mediation? parties find an optimal solution to the conflict. Both parties must agree to participate in mediation, and both parties must bring a representative to mediation that has full authority to settle the entire matter. Mediation Is Not Neither the Registrar nor the Office of Administrative Mandatory Hearings will penalize a party for not agreeing to mediation. Where do the Parties The parties will meet at the Office of Administrative Meet for Mediation? Hearings to participate in mediation.

The Office of Administrative Hearings is located at 1400 West Washington, Suite 101, Phoenix, Arizona 85007. When does Mediation can occur after the Registrar issues a citation, but Mediation Occur? before the administrative hearing. Why Should Parties Mediation can be an alternative to the full administrative Consider Mediation? process. Mediation is beneficial because it is (1) time- efficient, (2) cost-effective, (3) confidential, and (4) capable of providing flexible solutions to complex problems. How to Request If the parties wish to mediate this case, they must file a Joint Mediation Request for Mediation with the Office of Administrative Hearings. A Joint Request for Mediation is included with this Mediation Notice. REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA _________________________ Case No. _______________ COMPLAINANT,

v. JOINT REQUEST FOR MEDIATION _________________________ RESPONDENT.

REQUEST

The parties jointly request that this matter be referred to mediation in the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). ☐ This matter is set for hearing on __________________(date). ☐ This matter is not currently set for hearing. MEDIATION AGREEMENT By requesting this mediation and signing below, the parties understand, represent, and agree: 1. The parties are prepared to commence mediation and will be ready for mediation on _____________________(date); 2. The parties will participate in the mediation process in good faith; 3. This request for mediation is not intended to hinder or delay administrative proceedings; 4. No party will contend that the mediation limits the power of OAH and its administrative law judges to conduct an administrative hearing and issue decisions under A.R.S. §§ 41-1092 – 1092.12; 5. The parties will be courteous and respectful throughout the mediation process to all participants; 6. The mediation is completely voluntary and the principal purpose is to allow the parties a full and fair opportunity to discuss settlement; of 3 REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS 1700 W. Washington St. Suite 105 – PHOENIX, AZ 85007-2812 Telephone (602)542-1525 1-877-692-9762 7. The mediator may conduct joint and separate meetings with the parties and may suggest resolutions to the parties’ dispute, but the mediator has no authority to impose a settlement upon the parties; 8. The mediation process is confidential. Communications made, material created for or used during, and acts occurring during mediation are confidential and may not be discovered or admitted into evidence in any proceeding except as provided by A.R.S. § 12-2238; 9. The mediator is not subject to service of process or a subpoena to produce evidence or to testify regarding any evidence or occurrence relating to the mediation except as provided in A.R.S. § 12-2238(C); 10. Neither the mediator, nor the Registrar of Contractors, nor the Office of Administrative Hearings is subject to civil liability for any act or omission in connection with any mediation service or activity except for acts involving

intentional misconduct or reckless disregard of a substantial risk of injury to the rights of others; 11. Throughout the mediation process, each party must have a representative present who will have full settlement authority to settle all claims at issue in the administrative

proceeding. 12. The mediation process will terminate when: a. The parties reach settlement; b. The mediator determines that further efforts at mediation are no longer likely

to achieve a settlement; or c. One of the parties withdraws from mediation. _____________________________________ _______________________ Complainant (or representative) Date

_____________________________________ _______________________ Respondent (or representative) Date

of 3 REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS 1700 W. Washington St. Suite 105 – PHOENIX, AZ 85007-2812 Telephone (602)542-1525 1-877-692-9762 PREHEARING DISCLOSURE STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS ***DO NOT SUBMIT THESE INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE PREHEARING DISCLOSURE FORM***

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES A copy of the Arizona Administrative Code’s Rules for the Registrar of Contractors can be located on the Registrar’s Website.

PREHEARING DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT Under A.A.C. R4-9-118(A), before a hearing, the parties must prepare a disclosure statement. The disclosure statement must contain: • A list of all the witnesses the party will call to testify, including the witnesses’ contact information and a brief description of the subject matter of the witnesses’ expected testimony; and • A list of all the exhibits that the party will use at the hearing.

FILE PREHEARING DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS • The Prehearing Disclosure Statements and Exhibits may be submitted to the Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings using any of the following: • Electronically: https://portal.azoah.com/submission/ • In-Person or by Mail: 1740 West Adams Street, Lower Level, Phoenix, Arizona 85007

EXCHANGING DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS Under A.A.C. R4-9-118(B) (effective November 5, 2017), a party to the hearing must serve on every other party and file with the Office of Administrative Hearings a copy of: • The disclosure statement; and, • Any exhibit that the party will use at the hearing. Service: The disclosure statement and exhibits must be served on all parties in accordance with Arizona Administrative Code R2-19-108 Filing Documents. Under A.A.C. R2-19-108, service is completed by: • Personal delivery; • 1st class, certified or express mail; or • Facsimile. Timing: The disclosure statement and the exhibits must be served and filed not less than seven calendar days before the date of the hearing. Under A.A.C. R2-19-108, a document is served on a party: • On the date it is personally served; • Five days after it is mailed by express or 1st class mail; • On the date of the return receipt if it is mailed by certified mail; or • On the date indicated on the facsimile transmission.

CONSEQUENCES FOR FAILING TO DISCLOSE Under A.A.C. R4-9-108(C), if a witness or an exhibit is not timely disclosed as required the rules, and good cause for the failure to disclose is not shown, then the administrative law judge may: • Order that certain witnesses or exhibits not be used at the hearing; • Order that a particular fact is or is not established for the record; or, • Order that a charge, a defense, a claim, or some portion thereof, be dismissed.

Form RC-L-800A Prehearing Disclosure Statement Rev. 10/08/2019 Instructions Form PREHEARING DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FORM RC-L-800A

PART 1: WITNESS LIST DOCKET NO. Under A.A.C. R4-9-118(A), before a hearing, a party must prepare a disclosure statement containing a list of all the witnesses the party will call to testify, including the witnesses’ contact information and a brief description of the subject matter of the witnesses’ expected testimony. If you need additional space to list all witnesses, complete and attach additional Witness Lists. Example 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

John Doe (123) 456-7890 [email redacted] 4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

John Doe will testify regarding the poor workmanship and poor installation of the Garage Door. Mr. Doe will also testify regarding the invoices and change orders for the project.

Witness 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

Witness 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

Witness 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

Witness 1. Name 2. Telephone Number 3. Email Address

4. Subject Matter of Expected Testimony

Form RC-L-800A Prehearing Disclosure Statement Rev. 1/15/2019 Page 1 of 3 PART 2: EXHIBIT LIST DOCKET NO. Under A.A.C. R4-9-118(A), before a hearing, a party must prepare a disclosure statement containing a list of all the exhibits that the party will use at the hearing. Note: All exhibits listed below must be provided to all parties to the hearing. See A.A.C. R4-9-118(B). If you need additional space to list all witnesses, complete and attach additional Exhibit Lists. Example Contract for new garage door. Invoice #10001 – Cost for garage door replacement.

Exhibit Exhibit Name

Form RC-L-800A Prehearing Disclosure Statement Rev. 1/15/2019 Page 2 of 3 PART 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT & SIGNATURE I certify that the above information is true and correct and that I will serve a copy of this disclosure statement and any exhibits listed in Part 2 to all parties to the hearing in accordance with A.A.C. R4-9-118. I acknowledge and understand that if I fail to properly disclose a witness or exhibit, the administrative law judge may: • Order that certain witnesses or exhibits not be used at the hearing; • Order that a particular fact is or is not established for the record; or, • Order that a charge, a defense, a claim, or some portion thereof, be dismissed.

I am the (check one):  Complainant  Respondent Docket No.

Print Name Signature Date

Form RC-L-800A Prehearing Disclosure Statement Rev. 1/15/2019 Page 3 of 3