ALJDEC decisions subject to certification as final
2022A-04433-CHC-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2023-08-02
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
Ashley Bell,
COMPLAINANT,
v.
Glen Branham Construction LLC
License No. ROC 321071,
RESPONDENT.
No. 2022A-04433-CHC-ROC
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
DECISION
HEARING: August 02, 2023 at 1:00 PM.
APPEARANCES: No appearance(s) by or on behalf of Ashley Bell (“Complainant”). Glen Branham appeared on behalf of Glen Branham Construction LLC (“Respondent”). Jason Simpson appeared on behalf of the Arizona Registrar of Contractors (“Registrar”). Angela Bender observed.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Jenna Clark.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Background and Procedure
On June 27, 2023, the Registrar issued a Notice of Hearing on Contested Case (“Notice of Hearing”) in the above-captioned matter which set a hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”), an independent state agency, at 1:00 p.m. on August 02, 2023, to determine if grounds existed for the Registrar to discipline Respondent’s contracting license based on alleged violations of Arizona Revised Statutes (“Ariz. Rev. Stat.”) §§ 32-1154(A)(3); Arizona Administrative Code (“Ariz. Admin. Code”) R4-9-108(a) and 1154(A)(22). Correspondence issued to Complainant was not returned as undeliverable.
On July 17, 2023, OAH issued a Hearing Order to the parties which provided teleconference and videoconference participation information. Correspondence issued to Complainant was not returned as undeliverable.
Hearing Evidence
On August 02, 2023, though afforded a ten (10) minute grace period, Complainant failed to appear.
No correspondence was received on behalf of Complainant to provide notice of unavailability, appear via alternative means, or continue.
No settlement is on file for this matter at OAH.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Registrar has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 32-1101 et seq. and 32-1154(A). The matter was properly brought before OAH pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 41-1092 et seq.
Complainant bears the burden of proof to establish cause to discipline Respondent’s license by a preponderance of the evidence. Respondent bears the burden to establish factors in mitigation of the penalty and affirmative defenses by the same evidentiary standard.
“A preponderance of the evidence is such proof as convinces the trier of fact that the contention is more probably true than not.” A preponderance of the evidence is “[t]he greater weight of the evidence, not necessarily established by the greater number of witnesses testifying to a fact but by evidence that has the most convincing force; superior evidentiary weight that, though not sufficient to free the mind wholly from all reasonable doubt, is still sufficient to incline a fair and impartial mind to one side of the issue rather than the other.”
Ariz. Admin. Code R2-19-117 provides that if a party fails to appear at a hearing, the administrative law judge may vacate the hearing and return the matter to the agency for any further action.
Here, Complainant failed to appear without establishing good cause. As such, it must be concluded that Complainant defaulted her appearance.
Because the record does not establish violation(s) of Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 32-1154(A)(3); Ariz. Admin. Code R4-9-108(a), and/or 32-1154(A)(22), no grounds exist for the Registrar to take disciplinary action against ROC License No. 321071.
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Based on the foregoing,
IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Registrar dismiss Complaint No. 2022-04433.
NOTICE
Pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1092.08(I), the licensee may accept the Administrative Law Judge Decision by advising the Office of Administrative Hearings in writing not more than ten (10) days after receiving the decision. If the licensee accepts the Administrative Law Judge Decision, the decision shall be certified as the Final Decision by the Office of Administrative Hearings.
In the event of certification of the Administrative Law Judge Decision by the Director of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the effective date of the Order will be forty (40) days from the date of that certification.
Done this day, August 02, 2023.
Office of Administrative Hearings
/s/ Jenna Clark
Administrative Law Judge
Transmitted by either mail, e-mail, or facsimile to:
Martín Quezada, Director
c/o Legal Department
Registrar of Contractors
1700 W. Washington St., Ste. 105
Phoenix, AZ 85007
[email redacted]
Glen Branham Construction LLC, Respondent
267 E. Whitely St.
Apache Junction, AZ 85119
[email redacted]
Ashley Bell, Complainant
1487 S. Mountain View Rd.
Apache Junction, AZ 85119
[email redacted]
By: OAH Staff