Vacate: Settlement Recommendation

2011A-4534-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2012-02-08

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

HEARING: February 8, 2012, at 8:00 a.m. APPEARANCES: The Complainants appeared through Linda Gillespie. The Respondent appeared through its attorney, Adam Weisman. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: M. Douglas

Evidence and testimony were presented and the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order are made: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. During the scheduled hearing, the parties manifested movement in the direction of a resolution of the matter at issue. Therefore, the parties were afforded the opportunity to craft a settlement agreement, the essential terms of which were stated for the record. 2. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Respondent agreed to pay the Complainants the sum of $10,000.00 on or before 5:00 pm, February 10, 2012. The Complainants agreed to withdraw the complaint at issue and agreed to the dismissal with prejudice of the instant Complaint and Citation and release and foregone any civil claims against the Respondent for the matters at issue. 3. The Respondent agreed to prepare a written Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims which the Complainants agreed to sign. 4. The parties acknowledged that they understand the terms of their Settlement Agreement and that they had entered into the Settlement Agreement voluntarily and in good faith. 5. This tribunal finds that the terms of the Settlement Agreement are reasonable under the circumstances and that the Settlement Agreement was the product of knowing and voluntary action on the part of each party thereto. 6. In light of having entered into the Settlement Agreement, the Complainants and the Respondent agreed to vacate the hearing in this matter. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A general policy of law favors the settlement of disputes and adverse parties should be free to adjust their differences by entry into agreements and stipulations of settlement which should be recognized and given effect by the tribunal having jurisdiction over the issues and statutory enforcement authority. 2. Termination of the instant hearing is mandated by the parties having entered into the Settlement Agreement, as well as having agreed to vacate the hearing. A.A.C.R2-19-111(1) and (4). ORDER Pursuant to A.A.C. R2-19-111(1) and (4), it is ordered vacating the hearing in this matter and remanding this matter to the Director of the Arizona Registrar of Contractors for further disposition.

Done this day, February 8, 2012. _________________________________ M. Douglas Administrative Law Judge

Copy transmitted by mail this _____ Day of _________, 2012 to:

William A. Mundell, Director Registrar of Contractors c/o Legal Department 3838 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85012

By _______________________________

-----------------------

Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826