ALJDEC decisions subject to certification as final
2009A-10434335-R0C · Registrar of Contractors · 2012-03-29
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
|BETH MALAPANES | | No. 2009A-10434335-R0C | | | | | |COMPLAINANT | |ADMINISTRATIVE | |V. | |LAW JUDGE DECISION | | | | | |License No. K-48.235255-D of | | | |BROADWAY FLOORING LLC | | | | | | | |RESPONDENT | | | | | | |
HEARING: March 29, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. APPEARANCES: The Complainant appeared through her attorney, Thomas C. Hall, Esq., Thomas C. Hall Law Office. The Respondent appeared through its authorized representative, Michael Broadway. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: M. Douglas
Evidence and testimony were presented and the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended Order are made: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Notice of Claim for Administrative Payout provides, in pertinent part, as follows: The Complainant named above filed a claim for payment with the Residential Contractors’ Recovery Fund pursuant to A.R.S. § 32- 1154(F). After a review of the claim and all supporting documentation, the Fund has determined that Complainant is to be awarded $3,504.60 in the form of a payment issued by the Fund. This amount was calculated based upon the low bid from a licensed contractor to repair deficient work performed by Respondent, as set forth in the underlying disciplinary case. In accordance with A.R.S. § 32-1154(F), both Complainant and Respondent have fifteen (15) days from the date of mailing of this Notice or until October 29, 2011, to request an administrative hearing to contest the amount and/or propriety of the payment.
2. The Respondent requested an administrative hearing on January 5, 2012. 3. License No. K-48.235255-D of Broadway Flooring LLC was revoked by the Registrar of Contractors on September 1, 2011, based upon the Default Decision and Order issued in this matter. 4. License No. K-48.235255-D of Broadway Flooring LLC was again revoked by the Registrar of Contractors on September 1, 2011, for Respondent’s failure to pay a civil penalty imposed as a result of Respondent’s failure to comply with the written directive issued in this matter. 5. Complainant is an “injured person” as defined by statute and is entitled to receive payment from the Contractors’ Recovery Fund for damages sustained as a result of Respondent’s acts or omissions in this matter. 6. Based upon credible testimony and evidence produced at hearing, it is found that a proper and reasonable amount payable to Complainant from the Contractors’ Recovery Fund for Complainant’s actual damages is the sum of $3,504.60. This amount represents the lowest bid from a properly licensed contractor for the correction of the Complainant’s shower in accordance with the written directive and the Default Decision and Order issued in this matter. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A.R.S. § 32-1132(A) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: The residential contractors' recovery fund is established, to be administered by the registrar, from which any person injured by an act, representation, transaction or conduct of a residential contractor licensed pursuant to this chapter that is in violation of this chapter or the rules adopted pursuant to this chapter may be awarded in the county where the violation occurred an amount of not more than thirty thousand dollars for damages sustained by the act, representation, transaction or conduct. An award from the fund is limited to the actual damages suffered by the claimant as a direct result of the contractor's violation but shall not exceed an amount necessary to complete or repair a residential structure or appurtenance within residential property lines. 2. The credible evidence of record supports an award from the Contractors’ Recovery Fund to Complainant in the sum of $3,504.60, all of which shall be appropriately chargeable against Respondent and/or persons on Respondent’s license as set forth in A.R.S. § 32-1139(B) RECOMMENDed order In view of the foregoing, it is recommended that the Registrar of Contractors commence and finalize payment procedures from the Contractors’ Recovery Fund to Complainant in the total amount of $3,504.60 for Complainant’s actual damages in this matter. In the event of certification of this Administrative Law Judge Decision by the Director of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the effective date of the Order will be 40 days from the date of the certification.
Done this day, April 9, 2012.
/s/ M. Douglas Administrative Law Judge
Transmitted electronically to:
William A. Mundell, Director Registrar of Contractors
-----------------------
Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826