ALJDEC decisions subject to certification as final

09F-3247-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2009-10-13

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

|VICKI WINKLER | | No. 09F-3247-ROC | | | | | |COMPLAINANT, | |ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE | |-v- | |DECISION | | | | | |License No. 103060, Class C-39R of | | | |AL TECH ENERGY MANAGEMENT, INC. | | | |(CORP) | | | | | | | | | | | |RESPONDENT. | | | | | | |

HEARING: October 13, 2009 APPEARANCES: Complainant Vicki Winkler failed to appear. Lee Reardon appeared on behalf of Respondent Al Tech Energy Management, Inc. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Sondra J. Vanella _____________________________________________________________________ Based upon the entire record in this matter, the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommended Order are made: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On October 13, 2009 at 8:00 a.m., this matter came on for hearing pursuant to a Notice of Hearing issued by the Registrar of Contractors, to address whether Respondent Al Tech Energy Management, Inc. (“Al Tech”) should be subject to discipline for acts or omissions in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). At the time set for hearing, Lee Reardon appeared on behalf of Al Tech. Complainant Vicki Winkler failed to appear or be represented. The Administrative Law Judge delayed the start of the scheduled hearing for approximately fifteen (15) minutes to allow added time for appearance by or on behalf of Ms. Winkler. When Ms. Winkler continued in her failure to appear after the expiration of a fifteen minute grace period, and failed to notify the Office of Administrative Hearings of any cause for her absence or delay, the Administrative Law Judge convened the hearing and proceeded in Ms. Winkler’s absence. 1. Ms. Reardon made a motion to dismiss on behalf of Al Tech. Because Ms. Winkler failed to appear at hearing, she did not present any evidence in support of the allegations set forth in the complaint herein. CONCLUSION OF LAW 1. Ms. Winkler, by the aforementioned default in appearance at the hearing, failed to sustain the required burden of proving the charges set forth in the Citation and Complaint by a preponderance of the evidence, and consequently the instant record does not support any finding that Al Tech has violated the provisions of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). See Arizona Administrative Code Rule R2-19-119. RECOMMENDED ORDER In view of the foregoing, and in light of the lack of prosecution by Ms. Winkler, it is recommended that this Citation, together with the Complaint upon which it is based, be dismissed. In the event of certification of the Administrative Law Judge Decision by the Director of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the effective date of the Order will be 40 days from the date of that certification. Done this day, October 13, 2009.

______________________________________ Sondra J. Vanella Administrative Law Judge

Original transmitted by mail this ____ day of October, 2009, to:

William A. Mundell, Director Registrar of Contractors c/o Legal Department 3838 North Central Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85012

By ___________________________

-----------------------

Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826