ALJDEC decisions subject to certification as final
09F-2527-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2009-08-25
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
|CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL | | No. 09F-2527-ROC | |DISTRIBUTORS, INC. | | | | | |ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE | | | |DECISION | |COMPLAINANT, | | | |-v- | | | | | | | |License No. 173075, Class K-11 of | | | |CAVE CREEK ELECTRIC, L.L.C. (LLC) | | | | | | | | | | | |RESPONDENT. | | | | | | |
HEARING: August 25, 2009 APPEARANCES: Complainant Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. failed to appear or be represented. Mike Kires and Karen Kires appeared on behalf of Respondent Cave Creek Electric, L.L.C. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Sondra J. Vanella _____________________________________________________________________ Based upon the entire record in this matter, the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommended Order are made: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On August 25, 2009 at 1:30 p.m., this matter came on for hearing pursuant to a Notice of Hearing issued by the Registrar of Contractors, to address whether Respondent Cave Creek Electric, L.L.C. (“Cave Creek”) should be subject to discipline for acts or omissions in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). At the time set for hearing, Mike Kires and Karen Kires appeared on behalf of Cave Creek. Complainant Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. (“Consolidated”) failed to appear or be represented. The Administrative Law Judge delayed the start of the scheduled hearing for approximately fifteen (15) minutes so as to allow added time for appearance by or on behalf of Consolidated. When Consolidated continued in its failure to appear after the expiration of a fifteen minute grace period, the Administrative Law Judge convened the hearing and proceeded in its absence. 1. Mr. Kires made a motion to dismiss. Because Consolidated failed to appear at hearing, it did not present any evidence in support of the allegations set forth in the complaint herein. CONCLUSION OF LAW 1. Consolidated, by the aforementioned default in appearance at the hearing, failed to sustain the required burden of proving the charges set forth in the Citation and Complaint by a preponderance of the evidence, and consequently the instant record does not support any finding that Cave Creek has violated the provisions of A.R.S. § 32-1154(A). See Arizona Administrative Code Rule R2-19-119. RECOMMENDED ORDER In view of the foregoing, and in light of the lack of prosecution by Consolidated, it is recommended that this Citation, together with the Complaint upon which it is based, be dismissed. In the event of certification of the Administrative Law Judge Decision by the Director of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the effective date of the Order will be 40 days from the date of that certification. Done this day, August 25, 2009.
______________________________________ Sondra J. Vanella Administrative Law Judge
Original transmitted by mail this ____ day of August, 2009, to:
William A. Mundell, Director Registrar of Contractors c/o Legal Department 3838 North Central Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85012
By ___________________________
-----------------------
Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826