ALJDEC decisions subject to certification as final

08F-P0018-ROC-com · Registrar of Contractors · 2010-03-01

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

|ALAN MALOTT | | No. 08F-P0018-ROC-com | | | | | |COMPLAINANT | |ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE | |v. | |DECISION | | | | | |License No. 194145, Class K-61 | | | |Pascual Arreola Torrez dba | | | |TORREZ HOMES REMODELING (INDIV) | | | | | | | |RESPONDENT | | | | | | |

HEARING: March 1, 2010 at 1:00 p.m. APPEARANCES: The Complainant appeared on his own behalf. The Respondent appeared on his own behalf. A Spanish/English speaking interpreter was present for the hearing. . ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: M. Douglas

This matter came on for a Compliance Hearing to determine whether the Respondent has fully complied with the terms and conditions of the previously entered Decision and Order of the Registrar of Contractors. Evidence and testimony were presented and the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended Order on Compliance Hearing are made: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The credible evidence of record established that the Respondent has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the Registrar’s Order of December 5, 2008.. 2. Credible evidence established that the Respondent’s actions over a prolonged period of time are not indicative of a good faith desire to resolve this matter by complying with the terms and conditions of the prior Order of the Registrar of Contractors. On the contrary, credible evidence of record establishes that the Respondent has repeatedly failed to properly accomplish compliance with the terms and conditions of the prior Order and that the Respondent’s efforts appear to have been directed to delay and excuse, rather than to achieve, compliance with the prior Order of the Registrar of Contractors. 3. Credible testimony established that there was no unreasonable interference or denial of access by the Complainant. 4. Notice is taken of the Respondent’s License record with the Registrar of Contractors. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Credible testimony and evidence presented during the compliance hearing supported findings that the Respondent has not fully complied with the terms and conditions of the prior Order of the Registrar of Contractors. 2. A licensed contractor is not entitled to an unlimited period of time or an endless succession of opportunities to comply with specified conditions which reduce, eliminate, or terminate, disciplinary action against the Contractor’s License.

RECOMMENDed order on compliance hearing In view of the foregoing, it is recommended that the Respondent’s K-61 License shall be revoked. In the event of certification of this Administrative Law Judge Decision by the Director of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the effective date of the Order will be 40 days from the date of the certification.

Done this day, March 1, 2010.

/s/ M. Douglas Administrative Law Judge

Transmitted electronically to:

William A. Mundell, Director Registrar of Contractors -----------------------

Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826