Vacate: Settlement Recommendation

07F-M2029-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2008-04-29

STATE OF ARIZONA IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

HEARING: April 29, 2008.

APPEARANCES: >The Complainant appeared in her own behalf. >The Respondent appeared through its President and qualifying party, Stuart Farr.

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Robert I. Worth ________________________________________________________________

Based upon the entire record, the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Vacating and Remanding Order are made.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Following discussions between the parties during a prolonged recess after the presentation of evidence and testimony at the scheduled hearing and prior to the formal adjournment thereof, with the Administrative Law Judge remaining present, the parties concluded a settlement agreement, the essential terms of which were read upon the record. The balance of the proceeding was thereupon recessed with the mutual understanding that this tribunal shall enter its Order vacating the balance of the administrative hearing process and remanding

this matter to the Registrar of Contractors, as the forwarding Department, for appropriate further action in terminating this administrative matter.

2. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the concluded settlement agreement, the Respondent agreed to return to the jobsite and to perform certain specified further grout work in a proper, workmanlike manner at designated household locations, utilizing described additional materials, no later than a stated deadline date. Complainant agreed to pay Respondent a specified sum of money applicable to the cost of the added materials within a short time frame and also to grant reasonable and timely access to the premises for Respondent and its workers so as to enable performance of such further work. The Complainant additionally agreed to withdraw her filed complaint in this administrative action and to consent to the entry of an Order by the Registrar closing the within Citation as resolved and settled.

3. These administrative disciplinary proceedings are effectively cut short by the parties’ entry into the above-described settlement agreement which is to be presented to the Registrar of Contractors for approval and adoption. Consequently, Respondent must be and hereby is advised that any future alleged and proven breach of the further work terms of the settlement agreement will not only constitute grounds for the filing of a new complaint or a timely petition for rehearing but also shall warrant treatment as a circumstance in aggravation.

4. The concluded settlement agreement effectively constituted a merger of all of Complainant’s rights and all of Respondent’s defenses. If any future proceedings should become necessary, the sole issues before the Registrar shall be whether the parties have complied with their respective obligations under the parties’ settlement. 5. It was mutually understood that the entry by the respective parties into the settlement agreement was without any admission of fault, liability or obligation on the part of Respondent, and correspondingly without any admission by Complainant that she was not entitled to greater benefits.

6. The terms of the foregoing settlement agreement appeared to be fair and reasonable under all the circumstances, and the agreement was determined to be the product of knowing and voluntary action on the part of each party.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The policy of the law favors settlements of disputes, and adverse parties should be free to adjust their differences by entry into agreements or stipulations which should be recognized and given effect by all tribunals.

2. The settlement reached and submitted during the hearing of this matter, having been found to be reasonable and voluntarily made, warrants the termination of the instant hearing process and the remanding of the matter to the forwarding agency for further appropriate action.

ORDER VACATING BALANCE OF HEARING PROCESS AND REMANDING MATTER TO FORWARDING AGENCY

In view of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the balance of the hearing process in this matter be and hereby is VACATED, and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be REMANDED TO THE REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS for appropriate action.

Dated: April 30, 2008. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

______________________________________ Robert I. Worth Administrative Law Judge

Original transmitted on _____________________

by: _____________________________ , to:

Fidelis V. Garcia, Director Registrar of Contractors 3838 North Central Avenue (Suite 400) Phoenix, AZ 85012 - 1906

-----------------------

Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826