Vacate: Settlement Recommendation
07F-G0724X-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2007-09-25
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
|LA MONA HOLLAND | |Nos. 07F-G0724-ROC | | | |07F-G0724W-ROC | |COMPLAINANT, | |07F-G0724X-ROC | | | | | |-v- | |ORDER VACATING | | | |HEARING DUE TO SETTLEMENT | |License No. 091978, Class C-08 of | | | |HAYDEN'S CARPET, INC. (CORP) | | | |License No. 092339, Class C-48 of | | | |HAYDEN'S CARPET, INC. (CORP) | | | |License No. 104355, Class L-48 of | | | |HAYDEN'S CARPET, INC. (CORP) | | | | | | | |RESPONDENTS. | | | | | | |
The hearing of this matter convened on September 25, 2007. Complainant La Mona Holland appeared on her own behalf. Tony Ballard appeared on behalf of Respondent Hayden’s Carpet, Inc. Based upon the entire record in this matter, the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order are submitted to the Director of the Arizona Registrar of Contractors. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Prior to the commencement of the hearing, outside the presence of the Administrative Law Judge, the parties concluded a settlement agreement, the terms of which were read upon the record. 2. The terms of the aforementioned settlement agreement are as follows: a. Respondent will reduce the remaining balance due from Complainant to $1,200.00, to be paid upon the completion of the corrective work as delineated below; b. If a lien has been placed on Complainant’s property, Respondent will release the lien upon payment by Complainant of the $1,200.00 reduced balance; c. Respondent will provide to Complainant a two-year extension on the existing extended warranty on the carpet installation to commence from the date the corrective work is completed; d. Respondent will repair the grout in the kitchen in front of the stove, as well as the grout in the entry way into the third bedroom; and e. Respondent will perform repair work to the carpet seam in the hallway. 3. The Administrative Law Judge finds the terms of the foregoing settlement to be the product of knowing and voluntary action on the part of each party. 4. Based on the settlement agreement between the parties, the hearing was vacated. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The policy of the law favors settlements of disputes and adverse parties should be free to adjust their differences by entry into agreements or stipulations of settlement which should be recognized and given effect by all tribunals. 2. The settlement reached and submitted during the hearing of this matter, having been found to be voluntarily made, warrants the termination of the instant hearing. ORDER In view of the foregoing, the hearing in this matter is vacated and the matter is hereby remanded to the Registrar of Contractors for appropriate disposition.
Done this day, September 25, 2007.
_________________________________ Sondra J. Vanella Administrative Law Judge
Copy transmitted by mail this _____ day of September, 2007 to:
Fidelis V. Garcia, Director Registrar of Contractors Legal Department 800 West Washington, 6th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85007
By _______________________________
-----------------------
Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826