Vacate: Settlement Recommendation
07F-G0265-ROC · Registrar of Contractors · 2007-06-26
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
|RONALD KONCZAK AND CRISTINA KONCZAK | |No. 07F-G0265-ROC | | | | | |COMPLAINANT, | | | | | |ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION | |-v- | |AND ORDER VACATING | | | |HEARING BASED UPON A SETTLEMENT | |License No. 218772, Class C-21 | |AGREEMENT | |BRILLIANT BACKYARDS LANDSCAPING L L | | | |C (LLC) | | | | | | | |RESPONDENT. | | | | | | |
HEARING: June 25, 2006 APPEARANCES: Complainants appeared on their own behalf and Respondent appeared through its owner, Tonya Myers. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Mark A. Silver ________________________________________________________________
Based upon the entire record in this matter, the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommended Order are made:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Following a prolonged discussion between the parties, prior to commencement of the instant hearing, the parties concluded a settlement agreement, the essential terms of which were read upon the record.
2. Pursuant to the terms of the aforementioned settlement agreement, Respondent agreed to cancel any claim that it may have in a judgment entered in Hassayampa Justice Court, in case no. CC2006-129827. Respondent agreed that it will not attempt to secure payment from Complainants in regard to said judgment. In addition, Respondent agreed that it will file no claim for any further payment from Complainants and will not file any lien against Complainants’ property. Complainants agreed to withdraw the instant Complaint with the Registrar of Contractors.
3. The parties agreed that all rights and defenses were to be merged into the settlement agreement and if any petition for rehearing of this matter was to be filed and granted, or if any new complaint was filed, the sole issues for determination shall be whether the parties have performed their respective obligations under the terms of the aforesaid settlement agreement.
4. The terms of the forgoing settlement were determined to be the product of knowing and voluntary action on the part of each party.
5. Based on the settlement agreement, the hearing was vacated. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The policy of the law favors settlements of disputes and adverse parties should be free to adjust their differences by entry into agreements or stipulations of settlement which should be recognized and given effect by all tribunals.
2. The settlement reached and submitted during the hearing of this matter, having been found to be voluntarily made, warrants the termination of the instant hearing.
ORDER
In view of the foregoing, it is recommended that this matter be vacated from the calendar of the Office of Administrative Hearings and remanded to the referring Agency for appropriate disposition. Done this day, June 26, 2007.
_________________________________ Mark A. Silver Administrative Law Judge
Copy transmitted by mail this _____ day of _________, 2007 to:
Fidelis V. Garcia, Director Registrar of Contractors Legal Department 800 West Washington, 6th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85007
By _______________________________
-----------------------
Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826