ALJDEC
01-13184-CPP · Department of Administration - Capitol Police Parking · 2001-08-16
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
|In the Matter of Capital Police | | No. 01-13184-CPP | |Parking Citation 13184 Issued to: | | | | | | | |Mark Flores, BIN #40 | |DECISION AND ORDER OF THE | |1535 W. Jefferson | |ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE | |Phoenix, AZ 85007 | | | | | | | |Petitioner/Appellant. | | | | | | |
HEARING: August 16, 2001 APPEARANCES: Petitioner did not appear on his own behalf; the State of Arizona, Department of Administration, Capitol Police was represented by Capitol Police Security Aide Charlie Warner. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Eric A. Bryant _____________________________________________________________________
Petitioner Mark Flores has appealed the issuance of Capitol Police citation 13184, issued for unauthorized parking in a reserved (yellow permit) parking space. The Administrative Law Judge makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order upholding the citation. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On May 30, 2001 at about 11:09 a.m., Capitol Police Security Aide Charlie Warner issued a citation to Petitioner’s car parked in a yellow permit space at 1535 W. Jefferson in Phoenix. Citation 13184 imposes a fine of $16.00 for “parking in a location not designated as a parking space.” See, A.A.C. R2-6-206(B)(6). 2. Petitioner mailed the citation back to the Capitol Police, having checked the box marked “appeal requested.” 3. On June 26, 2001, the Capitol Police by certified mail sent Petitioner notice of the date, time, and place for the hearing. 4. At the time and place for the hearing, Capitol Police Security Aide Charlie Warner appeared. Petitioner did not appear. This tribunal waited 20 minutes past the noticed start time, but Petitioner failed to appear.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 41-796(E) provides that Capitol Police may issue “a notice to appear for an alleged violation . . . directing a person accused of violating a rule for control of vehicles on state property . . . to appear at a designated place to contest the allegation of violation or admit the violation and pay a penalty.” The statute also says that “[u]pon failure of a person served with a notice . . . to appear, the administrative law judge may proceed to determine whether a violation has occurred and, if so, the penalty to be imposed.” 2. Given that Petitioner requested the hearing, Petitioner’s failure to appear is deemed to be an admission by Petitioner of the validity of the citation. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that citation 13184 for $16.00 is upheld and Petitioner shall pay the fine as prescribed in A.A.C. R2-6-207(C). This decision is the final administrative decision, notwithstanding A.R.S. § 41-1092.08, on standing motion of J. Elliott Hibbs, Director of the Arizona Department of Administration. Petitioner has the right to request a rehearing at the Arizona Department of Administration as provided in A.A.C. R2-6-208 and A.R.S. § 41- 1092.09.
Done this 8th day of August 2001.
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
______________________________________ Eric A. Bryant Administrative Law Judge
Original Decision and Order mailed this ___ day of August 2001, for distribution, to:
J. Elliott Hibbs, Director ATTN: Wendy Hammon Department of Administration-Capital Police Parking 1700 W. Washington, Room B-15 Phoenix, Arizona 85007
By ___________________________ -----------------------
Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington, Suite 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-9826